Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PACLX vs RPBAX
PACLX vs RPBAX Comparison
Open Charts PACLX vs RPBAX
T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Adv
Price$35.20
Change+$0.01 (+0.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets71.43B
T. Rowe Price Balanced
Price$28.55
Change+$0.05 (+0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.06B
PACLX vs RPBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PACLX vs. RPBAX commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PACLX is a Buy and RPBAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PACLX has more cash in the bank: 71.4B vs. RPBAX (5.06B). RPBAX pays higher dividends than PACLX: RPBAX (1.90) vs PACLX (1.72). PACLX was incepted earlier than RPBAX: PACLX (21 years) vs RPBAX (86 years). PACLX (1.00) is less costly to investors than RPBAX (0.65). PACLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 85.00 vs. RPBAX (39.20). PACLX (2500) and RPBAX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RPBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.06 vs. PACLX (2.12). RPBAX return over 5 years is better than : 15.81 vs. PACLX (11.69).
| PACLX | RPBAX | PACLX / RPBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.97 | 0.60 | 162% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 0.65 | 154% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 86 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.378 | 10.302 | 33% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 71.4B | 5.06B | 1,411% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.72 | 1.90 | 90% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.12 | 9.06 | 23% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.71 | 35.65 | 69% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.69 | 15.81 | 74% |
| Returns for 10 years | 58.30 | 56.31 | 104% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement