Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PACLX vs RLBAX
PACLX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts PACLX vs RLBAX
T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Adv
Price$37.09
Change+$0.13 (+0.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets69.55B
American Funds American Balanced R1
Price$36.83
Change+$0.08 (+0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets254.37B
PACLX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PACLX vs. RLBAX commentary
Jul 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PACLX is a Buy and RLBAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 254B vs. PACLX (69.6B). PACLX pays higher dividends than RLBAX: PACLX (1.82) vs RLBAX (1.18). PACLX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: PACLX (21 years) vs RLBAX (23 years). RLBAX (1.31) is less costly to investors than PACLX (1.00). PACLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 85.00 vs. RLBAX (44.00). RLBAX has a lower initial minimum investment than PACLX: RLBAX (250) vs PACLX (2500). RLBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.42 vs. PACLX (5.53). RLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 35.28 vs. PACLX (21.98).
| PACLX | RLBAX | PACLX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.97 | 1.31 | 74% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 1.31 | 76% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.960 | 8.565 | 105% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 69.6B | 254B | 27% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.82 | 1.18 | 154% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.53 | 9.42 | 59% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.28 | 32.14 | 63% |
| Returns for 5 years | 21.98 | 35.28 | 62% |
| Returns for 10 years | 53.80 | 58.06 | 93% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement