Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PACAX vs TLSRX
PACAX vs TLSRX Comparison
Open Charts PACAX vs TLSRX
Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Cnsrv A
Price$10.95
Change-$0.03 (-0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets569.69M
Nuveen Lifestyle Income Retirement
Price$11.07
Change-$0.01 (-0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.26M
PACAX vs TLSRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PACAX vs. TLSRX commentary
Aug 01, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PACAX is a Buy and TLSRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PACAX has more cash in the bank: 570M vs. TLSRX (75.3M). TLSRX pays higher dividends than PACAX: TLSRX (3.52) vs PACAX (2.98). PACAX was incepted earlier than TLSRX: PACAX (32 years) vs TLSRX (14 years). PACAX (1.00) and TLSRX (0.97) have similar cost to investors . PACAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 372.00 vs. TLSRX (19.00). PACAX (0) and TLSRX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. TLSRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.79 vs. PACAX (6.15). TLSRX return over 5 years is better than : 9.77 vs. PACAX (8.44).
| PACAX | TLSRX | PACAX / TLSRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 0.69 | 145% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 0.97 | 103% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.308 | 4.953 | 107% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 570M | 75.3M | 757% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.98 | 3.52 | 84% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.15 | 6.79 | 91% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.05 | 15.73 | 96% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.44 | 9.77 | 86% |
| Returns for 10 years | 22.15 | 28.02 | 79% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement