Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PACAX vs PZRMX
PACAX vs PZRMX Comparison
Open Charts PACAX vs PZRMX
Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Cnsrv A
Price$11.03
Change+$0.05 (+0.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets569.18M
PIMCO Inflation Response Multi-Asst A
Price$8.51
Change+$0.01 (+0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.84B
PACAX vs PZRMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PACAX vs. PZRMX commentary
Jul 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PACAX is a Buy and PZRMX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PZRMX has more cash in the bank: 1.84B vs. PACAX (569M). PZRMX (2.98) and PACAX (2.98) have matching dividends . PACAX was incepted earlier than PZRMX: PACAX (31 years) vs PZRMX (14 years). PZRMX (2.62) is less costly to investors than PACAX (1.00). PACAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 372.00 vs. PZRMX (219.00). PACAX (6%) and PZRMX (6%) have equivalent initial investment costs. PACAX has a lower initial minimum investment than PZRMX: PACAX (0) vs PZRMX (1000). PZRMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.45 vs. PACAX (6.02). PZRMX return over 5 years is better than : 41.66 vs. PACAX (9.94).
| PACAX | PZRMX | PACAX / PZRMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 2.40 | 42% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 2.62 | 38% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.157 | 7.588 | 68% |
| Front Load | 6% | 6% | 105% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 569M | 1.84B | 31% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.98 | 2.98 | 100% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.02 | 9.45 | 64% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.83 | 18.16 | 104% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.94 | 41.66 | 24% |
| Returns for 10 years | 23.18 | 61.62 | 38% |