Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PACAX vs PPRMX
PACAX vs PPRMX Comparison
Open Charts PACAX vs PPRMX
Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Cnsrv A
Price$11.26
Change-$0.01 (-0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets577.87M
PIMCO Inflation Response Multi-Asst I2
Price$9.09
Change-$0.01 (-0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.94B
PACAX vs PPRMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PACAX vs. PPRMX commentary
Sep 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PACAX is a Buy and PPRMX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PPRMX has more cash in the bank: 1.94B vs. PACAX (578M). PACAX pays higher dividends than PPRMX: PACAX (3.40) vs PPRMX (3.08). PACAX was incepted earlier than PPRMX: PACAX (32 years) vs PPRMX (14 years). PPRMX (2.27) is less costly to investors than PACAX (1.00). PACAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 372.00 vs. PPRMX (322.00). PACAX has a lower initial minimum investment than PPRMX: PACAX (0) vs PPRMX (1000000). PPRMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.40 vs. PACAX (6.45). PPRMX return over 5 years is better than : 44.10 vs. PACAX (11.67).
| PACAX | PPRMX | PACAX / PPRMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 2.01 | 50% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 2.27 | 44% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.289 | 12.512 | 66% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 578M | 1.94B | 30% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.40 | 3.08 | 110% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.45 | 12.40 | 52% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.45 | 23.70 | 91% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.67 | 44.10 | 26% |
| Returns for 10 years | 28.74 | 83.78 | 34% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement