Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PACAX vs PPRMX
PACAX vs PPRMX Comparison
Open Charts PACAX vs PPRMX
Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Cnsrv A
Price$10.95
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets566.37M
PIMCO Inflation Response Multi-Asst I2
Price$8.78
Change+$0.05 (+0.57%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.84B
PACAX vs PPRMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PACAX vs. PPRMX commentary
Aug 03, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PACAX is a Buy and PPRMX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PPRMX has more cash in the bank: 1.84B vs. PACAX (566M). PACAX pays higher dividends than PPRMX: PACAX (3.66) vs PPRMX (3.18). PACAX was incepted earlier than PPRMX: PACAX (32 years) vs PPRMX (14 years). PPRMX (2.27) is less costly to investors than PACAX (1.00). PACAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 372.00 vs. PPRMX (322.00). PACAX has a lower initial minimum investment than PPRMX: PACAX (0) vs PPRMX (1000000). PPRMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.62 vs. PACAX (5.46). PPRMX return over 5 years is better than : 40.70 vs. PACAX (8.44).
| PACAX | PPRMX | PACAX / PPRMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 2.05 | 49% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 2.27 | 44% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.308 | 8.675 | 61% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 566M | 1.84B | 31% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.66 | 3.18 | 115% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.46 | 9.62 | 57% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.83 | 16.70 | 95% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.44 | 40.70 | 21% |
| Returns for 10 years | 22.49 | 73.05 | 31% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement