Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PACAX vs PMIYX
PACAX vs PMIYX Comparison
Open Charts PACAX vs PMIYX
Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Cnsrv A
Price$11.28
Change-$0.06 (-0.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets606.06M
Putnam Multi-Asset Income Y
Price$11.46
Change+$0.25 (+2.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets232.92M
PACAX vs PMIYX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PACAX vs. PMIYX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PACAX is a StrongBuy and PMIYX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PACAX has more cash in the bank: 606M vs. PMIYX (233M). PMIYX (3.94) and PACAX (3.80) have matching dividends . PACAX was incepted earlier than PMIYX: PACAX (32 years) vs PMIYX (3 years). PACAX (1.00) is less costly to investors than PMIYX (0.82). PACAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 243.00 vs. PMIYX (101.00). PACAX (0) and PMIYX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. PMIYX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.65 vs. PACAX (9.23).
| PACAX | PMIYX | PACAX / PMIYX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 0.60 | 167% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 0.82 | 122% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 3 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.894 | 1.441 | 62% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 606M | 233M | 260% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.80 | 3.94 | 96% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.23 | 11.65 | 79% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.21 | N/A | - |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.92 | N/A | - |
| Returns for 10 years | 42.58 | 22.93 | 186% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement