Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PACAX vs PMIYX
PACAX vs PMIYX Comparison
Open Charts PACAX vs PMIYX
Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Cnsrv A
Price$11.30
Change+$0.02 (+0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets580.07M
Putnam Multi-Asset Income Y
Price$11.16
Change+$0.02 (+0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets225.07M
PACAX vs PMIYX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PACAX vs. PMIYX commentary
Sep 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PACAX is a Buy and PMIYX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PACAX has more cash in the bank: 580M vs. PMIYX (225M). PMIYX pays higher dividends than PACAX: PMIYX (4.31) vs PACAX (3.40). PACAX was incepted earlier than PMIYX: PACAX (32 years) vs PMIYX (3 years). PACAX (1.00) is less costly to investors than PMIYX (0.84). PACAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 372.00 vs. PMIYX (143.00). PACAX (0) and PMIYX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. PMIYX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.79 vs. PACAX (5.18).
| PACAX | PMIYX | PACAX / PMIYX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 0.58 | 172% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 0.84 | 119% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 3 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.674 | 8.174 | 106% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 580M | 225M | 258% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.40 | 4.31 | 79% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.18 | 6.79 | 76% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.05 | N/A | - |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.63 | N/A | - |
| Returns for 10 years | 31.35 | 21.01 | 149% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement