Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PACAX vs PLCDX
PACAX vs PLCDX Comparison
Open Charts PACAX vs PLCDX
Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Cnsrv A
Price$11.36
Change+$0.02 (+0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets600.84M
Aristotle Portfolio OptimizatinCns I2
Price$10.90
Change+$0.02 (+0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets124.87M
PACAX vs PLCDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PACAX vs. PLCDX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PACAX is a StrongBuy and PLCDX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PACAX has more cash in the bank: 601M vs. PLCDX (125M). PLCDX (3.88) and PACAX (3.80) have matching dividends . PACAX was incepted earlier than PLCDX: PACAX (32 years) vs PLCDX (13 years). PACAX (1.00) is less costly to investors than PLCDX (0.83). PACAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 372.00 vs. PLCDX (53.00). PACAX (0) and PLCDX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. PLCDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.82 vs. PACAX (6.15). PACAX return over 5 years is better than : 9.73 vs. PLCDX (6.09).
| PACAX | PLCDX | PACAX / PLCDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 0.83 | 120% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 0.83 | 120% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.419 | 9.768 | 107% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 601M | 125M | 481% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.80 | 3.88 | 98% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.15 | 7.82 | 79% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.44 | 17.54 | 134% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.73 | 6.09 | 160% |
| Returns for 10 years | 29.22 | 27.34 | 107% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement