Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PACAX vs PLCDX
PACAX vs PLCDX Comparison
Open Charts PACAX vs PLCDX
Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Cnsrv A
Price$11.27
Change-$0.07 (-0.62%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets600.7M
Aristotle Portfolio OptimizatinCns I2
Price$10.80
Change-$0.07 (-0.64%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets124.88M
PACAX vs PLCDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PACAX vs. PLCDX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PACAX is a StrongBuy and PLCDX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PACAX has more cash in the bank: 601M vs. PLCDX (125M). PACAX (4.02) and PLCDX (3.90) have matching dividends . PACAX was incepted earlier than PLCDX: PACAX (32 years) vs PLCDX (13 years). PACAX (1.00) is less costly to investors than PLCDX (0.83). PACAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 372.00 vs. PLCDX (53.00). PACAX (0) and PLCDX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. PLCDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.06 vs. PACAX (6.87). PACAX return over 5 years is better than : 10.62 vs. PLCDX (7.03).
| PACAX | PLCDX | PACAX / PLCDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 0.83 | 120% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 0.83 | 120% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.544 | 8.761 | 109% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 601M | 125M | 481% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.02 | 3.90 | 103% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.87 | 8.06 | 85% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.03 | 19.56 | 133% |
| Returns for 5 years | 10.62 | 7.03 | 151% |
| Returns for 10 years | 29.11 | 25.94 | 112% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement