Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PABYX vs RLBFX
PABYX vs RLBFX Comparison
Open Charts PABYX vs RLBFX
Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Bal Y
Price$17.22
Change-$0.36 (-2.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.41B
American Funds American Balanced R5
Price$38.49
Change-$0.54 (-1.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets269.72B
PABYX vs RLBFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PABYX vs. RLBFX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PABYX is a Buy and RLBFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 270B vs. PABYX (2.41B). PABYX pays higher dividends than RLBFX: PABYX (3.47) vs RLBFX (2.13). PABYX was incepted earlier than RLBFX: PABYX (32 years) vs RLBFX (24 years). PABYX (0.68) is less costly to investors than RLBFX (0.29). PABYX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 158.00 vs. RLBFX (44.00). PABYX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBFX: PABYX (0) vs RLBFX (250). RLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.69 vs. PABYX (10.14). RLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 37.38 vs. PABYX (12.75).
| PABYX | RLBFX | PABYX / RLBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 0.29 | 234% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 0.29 | 234% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.533 | 2.503 | 61% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.41B | 270B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.47 | 2.13 | 163% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.14 | 11.69 | 87% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.82 | 38.02 | 84% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.75 | 37.38 | 34% |
| Returns for 10 years | 62.45 | 91.94 | 68% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement