Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PABYX vs RLBFX
PABYX vs RLBFX Comparison
Open Charts PABYX vs RLBFX
Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Bal Y
Price$17.50
Change+$0.04 (+0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.33B
American Funds American Balanced R5
Price$39.08
Change+$0.04 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets265.62B
PABYX vs RLBFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PABYX vs. RLBFX commentary
Oct 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PABYX is a Hold and RLBFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 266B vs. PABYX (2.33B). PABYX pays higher dividends than RLBFX: PABYX (2.58) vs RLBFX (2.00). PABYX was incepted earlier than RLBFX: PABYX (31 years) vs RLBFX (23 years). PABYX (0.68) is less costly to investors than RLBFX (0.29). PABYX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 222.00 vs. RLBFX (44.00). PABYX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBFX: PABYX (0) vs RLBFX (250). RLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.05 vs. PABYX (2.55). RLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 43.90 vs. PABYX (22.16).
| PABYX | RLBFX | PABYX / RLBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 0.29 | 234% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 0.29 | 234% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.152 | 14.890 | 82% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.33B | 266B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.58 | 2.00 | 129% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.55 | 9.05 | 28% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.79 | 51.85 | 73% |
| Returns for 5 years | 22.16 | 43.90 | 50% |
| Returns for 10 years | 44.22 | 78.80 | 56% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers