Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PABYX vs RLBAX
PABYX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts PABYX vs RLBAX
Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Bal Y
Price$17.51
Change-$0.18 (-1.02%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.34B
American Funds American Balanced R1
Price$38.66
Change-$0.48 (-1.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets268.67B
PABYX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PABYX vs. RLBAX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PABYX is a Buy and RLBAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 269B vs. PABYX (2.34B). PABYX pays higher dividends than RLBAX: PABYX (3.37) vs RLBAX (1.08). PABYX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: PABYX (31 years) vs RLBAX (23 years). RLBAX (1.31) is less costly to investors than PABYX (0.68). PABYX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 222.00 vs. RLBAX (44.00). PABYX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBAX: PABYX (0) vs RLBAX (250). RLBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.08 vs. PABYX (3.74). RLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 36.92 vs. PABYX (22.24).
| PABYX | RLBAX | PABYX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 1.31 | 52% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 1.31 | 52% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.357 | 15.481 | 93% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.34B | 269B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.37 | 1.08 | 311% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.74 | 9.08 | 41% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.90 | 40.52 | 84% |
| Returns for 5 years | 22.24 | 36.92 | 60% |
| Returns for 10 years | 47.77 | 69.99 | 68% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement