Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PABU vs SCHG
PABU vs SCHG Comparison
Open Charts PABU vs SCHG
iShares Paris-Algnd Clmt Optd MSCIUSAETF
Price$69.60
Change-$0.44 (-0.63%)
Volume$100
Net Assets2.25B
Schwab US Large-Cap Growth ETF™
Price$30.96
Change-$0.47 (-1.49%)
Volume$11.86K
Net Assets52.49B
PABU vs SCHG Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PABU vs. SCHG commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PABU is a Hold and SCHG is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCHG has more net assets: 52.5B vs. PABU (2.25B). SCHG has a higher annual dividend yield than PABU: SCHG (-3.617) vs PABU (-3.840). PABU was incepted earlier than SCHG: PABU (4 years) vs SCHG (16 years). SCHG (0.04) has a lower expense ratio than PABU (0.10). SCHG has a higher turnover PABU (15.00) vs PABU (15.00).
| PABU | SCHG | PABU / SCHG | |
| Gain YTD | -3.840 | -3.617 | 106% |
| Net Assets | 2.25B | 52.5B | 4% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.10 | 0.04 | 250% |
| Turnover | 15.00 | 27.00 | 56% |
| Yield | 0.92 | 0.37 | 252% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 16 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| PABU | SCHG | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 53% | 2 days ago 75% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 84% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 62% | 2 days ago 77% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 78% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 81% | 9 days ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 71% | 6 days ago 78% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 85% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
PABU and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PABU has been loosely correlated with QCOM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PABU jumps, then QCOM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PABU | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PABU | 100% | -1.97% | ||
| QCOM - PABU | 62% Loosely correlated | -3.56% | ||
| KEYS - PABU | 58% Loosely correlated | +1.75% | ||
| TEL - PABU | 58% Loosely correlated | -0.34% | ||
| SWKS - PABU | 57% Loosely correlated | -1.58% | ||
| BKNG - PABU | 56% Loosely correlated | -9.32% | ||
More | ||||
SCHG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SCHG has been closely correlated with AMZN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SCHG jumps, then AMZN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SCHG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCHG | 100% | -1.96% | ||
| AMZN - SCHG | 80% Closely correlated | -1.79% | ||
| NVDA - SCHG | 79% Closely correlated | -2.84% | ||
| PH - SCHG | 78% Closely correlated | +1.30% | ||
| MSFT - SCHG | 77% Closely correlated | -2.87% | ||
| APO - SCHG | 76% Closely correlated | -4.76% | ||
More | ||||