Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PABAX vs RLBFX
PABAX vs RLBFX Comparison
Open Charts PABAX vs RLBFX
Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Bal A
Price$17.62
Change+$0.02 (+0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.37B
American Funds American Balanced R5
Price$39.63
Change+$0.07 (+0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets268.19B
PABAX vs RLBFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PABAX vs. RLBFX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PABAX is a Buy and RLBFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 268B vs. PABAX (2.37B). PABAX pays higher dividends than RLBFX: PABAX (3.19) vs RLBFX (1.97). PABAX was incepted earlier than RLBFX: PABAX (32 years) vs RLBFX (24 years). PABAX (0.93) is less costly to investors than RLBFX (0.29). PABAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 222.00 vs. RLBFX (44.00). PABAX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBFX: PABAX (0) vs RLBFX (250). RLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.28 vs. PABAX (3.47). RLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 43.06 vs. PABAX (20.64).
| PABAX | RLBFX | PABAX / RLBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 0.29 | 321% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 0.29 | 321% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.098 | 16.507 | 85% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.37B | 268B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.19 | 1.97 | 162% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.47 | 10.28 | 34% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.84 | 44.74 | 73% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.64 | 43.06 | 48% |
| Returns for 10 years | 44.68 | 81.39 | 55% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement