Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PABAX vs RLBFX
PABAX vs RLBFX Comparison
Open Charts PABAX vs RLBFX
Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Bal A
Price$17.58
Change+$0.03 (+0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.36B
American Funds American Balanced R5
Price$39.83
Change+$0.07 (+0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets271.11B
PABAX vs RLBFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PABAX vs. RLBFX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PABAX is a Buy and RLBFX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 271B vs. PABAX (2.36B). PABAX pays higher dividends than RLBFX: PABAX (3.17) vs RLBFX (1.93). PABAX was incepted earlier than RLBFX: PABAX (32 years) vs RLBFX (24 years). PABAX (0.93) is less costly to investors than RLBFX (0.29). PABAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 222.00 vs. RLBFX (44.00). PABAX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBFX: PABAX (0) vs RLBFX (250). RLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.63 vs. PABAX (1.73). RLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 40.86 vs. PABAX (17.51).
| PABAX | RLBFX | PABAX / RLBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 0.29 | 321% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 0.29 | 321% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.645 | 16.889 | 81% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.36B | 271B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.17 | 1.93 | 164% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.73 | 9.63 | 18% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.31 | 41.38 | 71% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.51 | 40.86 | 43% |
| Returns for 10 years | 41.34 | 77.79 | 53% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers