Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PABAX vs RLBEX
PABAX vs RLBEX Comparison
Open Charts PABAX vs RLBEX
Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Bal A
Price$17.43
Change+$0.04 (+0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.33B
American Funds American Balanced R4
Price$38.94
Change+$0.04 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets265.37B
PABAX vs RLBEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PABAX vs. RLBEX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PABAX is a Hold and RLBEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBEX has more cash in the bank: 265B vs. PABAX (2.33B). PABAX pays higher dividends than RLBEX: PABAX (2.46) vs RLBEX (1.74). PABAX was incepted earlier than RLBEX: PABAX (32 years) vs RLBEX (23 years). PABAX (0.93) is less costly to investors than RLBEX (0.59). PABAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 222.00 vs. RLBEX (44.00). PABAX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBEX: PABAX (0) vs RLBEX (250). RLBEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.70 vs. PABAX (2.34). RLBEX return over 5 years is better than : 42.04 vs. PABAX (20.64).
| PABAX | RLBEX | PABAX / RLBEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 0.59 | 158% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 0.59 | 158% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.961 | 14.631 | 82% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.33B | 265B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.46 | 1.74 | 141% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.34 | 8.70 | 27% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.69 | 50.52 | 73% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.64 | 42.04 | 49% |
| Returns for 10 years | 41.18 | 77.69 | 53% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement