Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PABAX vs RLBEX
PABAX vs RLBEX Comparison
Open Charts PABAX vs RLBEX
Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Bal A
Price$17.15
Change-$0.35 (-2.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.4B
American Funds American Balanced R4
Price$38.33
Change-$0.56 (-1.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets269.72B
PABAX vs RLBEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PABAX vs. RLBEX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PABAX is a Buy and RLBEX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBEX has more cash in the bank: 270B vs. PABAX (2.41B). PABAX pays higher dividends than RLBEX: PABAX (3.27) vs RLBEX (1.87). PABAX was incepted earlier than RLBEX: PABAX (32 years) vs RLBEX (24 years). PABAX (0.93) is less costly to investors than RLBEX (0.59). PABAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 158.00 vs. RLBEX (44.00). PABAX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBEX: PABAX (0) vs RLBEX (250). RLBEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.32 vs. PABAX (9.88). RLBEX return over 5 years is better than : 35.56 vs. PABAX (11.25).
| PABAX | RLBEX | PABAX / RLBEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 0.59 | 158% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 0.59 | 158% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.479 | 2.459 | 60% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.41B | 270B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.27 | 1.87 | 175% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.88 | 11.32 | 87% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.76 | 36.71 | 84% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.25 | 35.56 | 32% |
| Returns for 10 years | 58.95 | 90.55 | 65% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement