Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PABAX vs RLBCX
PABAX vs RLBCX Comparison
Open Charts PABAX vs RLBCX
Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Bal A
Price$17.62
Change+$0.02 (+0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.37B
American Funds American Balanced R3
Price$38.80
Change-$0.48 (-1.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets268.67B
PABAX vs RLBCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PABAX vs. RLBCX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PABAX is a Buy and RLBCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBCX has more cash in the bank: 269B vs. PABAX (2.37B). PABAX pays higher dividends than RLBCX: PABAX (3.19) vs RLBCX (1.46). PABAX was incepted earlier than RLBCX: PABAX (32 years) vs RLBCX (23 years). PABAX (0.93) and RLBCX (0.89) have similar cost to investors . PABAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 222.00 vs. RLBCX (44.00). PABAX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBCX: PABAX (0) vs RLBCX (250). RLBCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.58 vs. PABAX (3.47). RLBCX return over 5 years is better than : 39.44 vs. PABAX (20.64).
| PABAX | RLBCX | PABAX / RLBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 0.89 | 104% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 0.89 | 104% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.098 | 15.928 | 89% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.37B | 269B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.19 | 1.46 | 218% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.47 | 9.58 | 36% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.84 | 42.30 | 78% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.64 | 39.44 | 52% |
| Returns for 10 years | 44.68 | 74.61 | 60% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement