Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PABAX vs RLBCX
PABAX vs RLBCX Comparison
Open Charts PABAX vs RLBCX
Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Bal A
Price$17.58
Change+$0.03 (+0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.36B
American Funds American Balanced R3
Price$39.46
Change+$0.07 (+0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets271.11B
PABAX vs RLBCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PABAX vs. RLBCX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PABAX is a Buy and RLBCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBCX has more cash in the bank: 271B vs. PABAX (2.36B). PABAX pays higher dividends than RLBCX: PABAX (3.17) vs RLBCX (1.44). PABAX was incepted earlier than RLBCX: PABAX (32 years) vs RLBCX (24 years). PABAX (0.93) and RLBCX (0.89) have similar cost to investors . PABAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 222.00 vs. RLBCX (44.00). PABAX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBCX: PABAX (0) vs RLBCX (250). RLBCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.93 vs. PABAX (1.73). RLBCX return over 5 years is better than : 37.26 vs. PABAX (17.51).
| PABAX | RLBCX | PABAX / RLBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 0.89 | 104% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 0.89 | 104% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.645 | 16.253 | 84% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.36B | 271B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.17 | 1.44 | 221% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.73 | 8.93 | 19% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.31 | 39.00 | 75% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.51 | 37.26 | 47% |
| Returns for 10 years | 41.34 | 71.11 | 58% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers