Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PABAX vs RLBCX
PABAX vs RLBCX Comparison
Open Charts PABAX vs RLBCX
Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Bal A
Price$17.03
Change+$0.03 (+0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.39B
American Funds American Balanced R3
Price$37.39
Change+$0.14 (+0.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets269.37B
PABAX vs RLBCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PABAX vs. RLBCX commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PABAX is a Buy and RLBCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBCX has more cash in the bank: 269B vs. PABAX (2.39B). PABAX pays higher dividends than RLBCX: PABAX (3.17) vs RLBCX (1.44). PABAX was incepted earlier than RLBCX: PABAX (32 years) vs RLBCX (24 years). PABAX (0.93) and RLBCX (0.89) have similar cost to investors . PABAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 158.00 vs. RLBCX (44.00). PABAX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBCX: PABAX (0) vs RLBCX (250). PABAX (8.90) and RLBCX (8.88) have marching annual gain over last year. RLBCX return over 5 years is better than : 32.94 vs. PABAX (13.11).
| PABAX | RLBCX | PABAX / RLBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 0.89 | 104% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 0.89 | 104% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.278 | 10.350 | 99% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.39B | 269B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.17 | 1.44 | 221% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.90 | 8.88 | 100% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.72 | 36.46 | 98% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.11 | 32.94 | 40% |
| Returns for 10 years | 46.69 | 70.46 | 66% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers