Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PABAX vs RLBBX
PABAX vs RLBBX Comparison
Open Charts PABAX vs RLBBX
Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Bal A
Price$17.62
Change+$0.02 (+0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.37B
American Funds American Balanced R2
Price$39.19
Change+$0.08 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets268.19B
PABAX vs RLBBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PABAX vs. RLBBX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PABAX is a Buy and RLBBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBBX has more cash in the bank: 268B vs. PABAX (2.37B). PABAX pays higher dividends than RLBBX: PABAX (3.19) vs RLBBX (1.09). PABAX was incepted earlier than RLBBX: PABAX (32 years) vs RLBBX (24 years). RLBBX (1.32) is less costly to investors than PABAX (0.93). PABAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 222.00 vs. RLBBX (44.00). PABAX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBBX: PABAX (0) vs RLBBX (250). RLBBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.11 vs. PABAX (3.47). RLBBX return over 5 years is better than : 36.96 vs. PABAX (20.64).
| PABAX | RLBBX | PABAX / RLBBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 1.32 | 70% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 1.32 | 70% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.098 | 15.500 | 91% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.37B | 268B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.19 | 1.09 | 293% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.47 | 9.11 | 38% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.84 | 40.59 | 81% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.64 | 36.96 | 56% |
| Returns for 10 years | 44.68 | 70.07 | 64% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement