Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PAARX vs RLBFX
PAARX vs RLBFX Comparison
Open Charts PAARX vs RLBFX
Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Bal R
Price$17.20
Change+$0.04 (+0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.33B
American Funds American Balanced R5
Price$39.08
Change+$0.04 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets265.62B
PAARX vs RLBFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PAARX vs. RLBFX commentary
Oct 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PAARX is a Hold and RLBFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 266B vs. PAARX (2.33B). PAARX pays higher dividends than RLBFX: PAARX (2.35) vs RLBFX (2.00). PAARX was incepted earlier than RLBFX: PAARX (23 years) vs RLBFX (23 years). PAARX (1.18) is less costly to investors than RLBFX (0.29). PAARX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 222.00 vs. RLBFX (44.00). PAARX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBFX: PAARX (0) vs RLBFX (250). RLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.05 vs. PAARX (1.98). RLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 43.90 vs. PAARX (18.79).
| PAARX | RLBFX | PAARX / RLBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 0.29 | 407% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 0.29 | 407% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.745 | 14.890 | 79% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.33B | 266B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.35 | 2.00 | 118% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.98 | 9.05 | 22% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.47 | 51.85 | 68% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.79 | 43.90 | 43% |
| Returns for 10 years | 37.10 | 78.80 | 47% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement