Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PAARX vs RLBFX
PAARX vs RLBFX Comparison
Open Charts PAARX vs RLBFX
Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Bal R
Price$16.82
Change+$0.01 (+0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.4B
American Funds American Balanced R5
Price$37.75
Change+$0.04 (+0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets269.37B
PAARX vs RLBFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PAARX vs. RLBFX commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PAARX is a Buy and RLBFX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 269B vs. PAARX (2.4B). PAARX pays higher dividends than RLBFX: PAARX (3.02) vs RLBFX (1.93). PAARX was incepted earlier than RLBFX: PAARX (23 years) vs RLBFX (24 years). PAARX (1.18) is less costly to investors than RLBFX (0.29). PAARX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 158.00 vs. RLBFX (44.00). PAARX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBFX: PAARX (0) vs RLBFX (250). RLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.39 vs. PAARX (8.58). RLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 36.42 vs. PAARX (11.45).
| PAARX | RLBFX | PAARX / RLBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 0.29 | 407% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 0.29 | 407% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.107 | 10.980 | 92% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.4B | 269B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.02 | 1.93 | 157% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.58 | 9.39 | 91% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.25 | 39.23 | 90% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.45 | 36.42 | 31% |
| Returns for 10 years | 41.98 | 76.59 | 55% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers