Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PAARX vs RLBCX
PAARX vs RLBCX Comparison
Open Charts PAARX vs RLBCX
Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Bal R
Price$17.22
Change-$0.18 (-1.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.34B
American Funds American Balanced R3
Price$38.80
Change-$0.48 (-1.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets268.67B
PAARX vs RLBCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PAARX vs. RLBCX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PAARX is a Buy and RLBCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBCX has more cash in the bank: 269B vs. PAARX (2.34B). PAARX pays higher dividends than RLBCX: PAARX (3.04) vs RLBCX (1.46). PAARX was incepted earlier than RLBCX: PAARX (23 years) vs RLBCX (23 years). PAARX (1.18) is less costly to investors than RLBCX (0.89). PAARX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 222.00 vs. RLBCX (44.00). PAARX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBCX: PAARX (0) vs RLBCX (250). RLBCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.58 vs. PAARX (3.12). RLBCX return over 5 years is better than : 39.44 vs. PAARX (18.87).
| PAARX | RLBCX | PAARX / RLBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 0.89 | 133% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 0.89 | 133% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.903 | 15.928 | 87% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.34B | 269B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.04 | 1.46 | 208% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.12 | 9.58 | 33% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.71 | 42.30 | 75% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.87 | 39.44 | 48% |
| Returns for 10 years | 40.53 | 74.61 | 54% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement