Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PAARX vs RLBCX
PAARX vs RLBCX Comparison
Open Charts PAARX vs RLBCX
Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Bal R
Price$16.92
Change-$0.36 (-2.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.41B
American Funds American Balanced R3
Price$38.13
Change-$0.57 (-1.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets269.72B
PAARX vs RLBCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PAARX vs. RLBCX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PAARX is a Buy and RLBCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBCX has more cash in the bank: 270B vs. PAARX (2.41B). PAARX pays higher dividends than RLBCX: PAARX (3.12) vs RLBCX (1.62). PAARX was incepted earlier than RLBCX: PAARX (23 years) vs RLBCX (24 years). PAARX (1.18) is less costly to investors than RLBCX (0.89). PAARX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 158.00 vs. RLBCX (44.00). PAARX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBCX: PAARX (0) vs RLBCX (250). RLBCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.97 vs. PAARX (9.51). RLBCX return over 5 years is better than : 33.82 vs. PAARX (9.55).
| PAARX | RLBCX | PAARX / RLBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 0.89 | 133% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 0.89 | 133% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.439 | 2.445 | 59% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.41B | 270B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.12 | 1.62 | 193% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.51 | 10.97 | 87% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.55 | 35.49 | 83% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.55 | 33.82 | 28% |
| Returns for 10 years | 54.38 | 84.49 | 64% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement