Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PAARX vs RLBCX
PAARX vs RLBCX Comparison
Open Charts PAARX vs RLBCX
Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Bal R
Price$17.36
Change+$0.04 (+0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.36B
American Funds American Balanced R3
Price$39.46
Change+$0.07 (+0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets271.11B
PAARX vs RLBCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PAARX vs. RLBCX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PAARX is a Buy and RLBCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBCX has more cash in the bank: 271B vs. PAARX (2.36B). PAARX pays higher dividends than RLBCX: PAARX (3.02) vs RLBCX (1.44). PAARX was incepted earlier than RLBCX: PAARX (23 years) vs RLBCX (24 years). PAARX (1.18) is less costly to investors than RLBCX (0.89). PAARX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 222.00 vs. RLBCX (44.00). PAARX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBCX: PAARX (0) vs RLBCX (250). RLBCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.93 vs. PAARX (1.37). RLBCX return over 5 years is better than : 37.26 vs. PAARX (15.70).
| PAARX | RLBCX | PAARX / RLBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 0.89 | 133% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 0.89 | 133% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.380 | 16.253 | 82% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.36B | 271B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.02 | 1.44 | 210% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.37 | 8.93 | 15% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.10 | 39.00 | 72% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.70 | 37.26 | 42% |
| Returns for 10 years | 37.19 | 71.11 | 52% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers