Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PAADX vs RLBCX
PAADX vs RLBCX Comparison
Open Charts PAADX vs RLBCX
Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Bal R5
Price$17.32
Change-$0.35 (-1.98%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.41B
American Funds American Balanced R3
Price$38.13
Change-$0.57 (-1.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets269.72B
PAADX vs RLBCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PAADX vs. RLBCX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PAADX is a Buy and RLBCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBCX has more cash in the bank: 270B vs. PAADX (2.41B). PAADX pays higher dividends than RLBCX: PAADX (3.41) vs RLBCX (1.62). PAADX was incepted earlier than RLBCX: PAADX (14 years) vs RLBCX (24 years). RLBCX (0.89) is less costly to investors than PAADX (0.71). PAADX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 158.00 vs. RLBCX (44.00). PAADX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBCX: PAADX (0) vs RLBCX (250). RLBCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.97 vs. PAADX (10.18). RLBCX return over 5 years is better than : 33.82 vs. PAADX (12.76).
| PAADX | RLBCX | PAADX / RLBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 0.89 | 80% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 0.89 | 80% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.524 | 2.445 | 62% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.41B | 270B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.41 | 1.62 | 211% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.18 | 10.97 | 93% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.80 | 35.49 | 90% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.76 | 33.82 | 38% |
| Returns for 10 years | 62.55 | 84.49 | 74% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement