Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PAADX vs RLBCX
PAADX vs RLBCX Comparison
Open Charts PAADX vs RLBCX
Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Bal R5
Price$17.60
Change-$0.19 (-1.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.34B
American Funds American Balanced R3
Price$38.80
Change-$0.48 (-1.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets268.67B
PAADX vs RLBCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PAADX vs. RLBCX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PAADX is a Buy and RLBCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBCX has more cash in the bank: 269B vs. PAADX (2.34B). PAADX pays higher dividends than RLBCX: PAADX (3.33) vs RLBCX (1.46). PAADX was incepted earlier than RLBCX: PAADX (13 years) vs RLBCX (23 years). RLBCX (0.89) is less costly to investors than PAADX (0.71). PAADX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 222.00 vs. RLBCX (44.00). PAADX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBCX: PAADX (0) vs RLBCX (250). RLBCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.39 vs. PAADX (3.75). RLBCX return over 5 years is better than : 37.74 vs. PAADX (22.26).
| PAADX | RLBCX | PAADX / RLBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 0.89 | 80% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 0.89 | 80% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.311 | 14.512 | 99% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.34B | 269B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.33 | 1.46 | 227% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.75 | 8.39 | 45% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.95 | 41.39 | 82% |
| Returns for 5 years | 22.26 | 37.74 | 59% |
| Returns for 10 years | 47.87 | 70.87 | 68% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement