It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
OXBR’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileRNR’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
OXBR’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RNR’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
OXBR (@Property/Casualty Insurance) experienced а -9.36% price change this week, while RNR (@Property/Casualty Insurance) price change was -0.83% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Property/Casualty Insurance industry was -0.99%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.75%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.64%.
OXBR is expected to report earnings on Aug 18, 2025.
RNR is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2025.
Property and casualty companies insure against accidents of non-physical harm, such as lawsuits, damage to personal assets, car crashes and more. Progressive Corporation, Travelers Companies, Inc. and Allstate Corporation are some of the biggest providers of such products.
OXBR | RNR | OXBR / RNR | |
Capitalization | 6.22M | 12.4B | 0% |
EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
Gain YTD | -62.383 | -1.450 | 4,302% |
P/E Ratio | 1.37 | 4.50 | 31% |
Revenue | -7.05M | 9.09B | -0% |
Total Cash | 495K | 6.48B | 0% |
Total Debt | 127K | 1.96B | 0% |
OXBR | RNR | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 5 | 70 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 91 Overvalued | 65 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 31 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | 91 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 93 | 54 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 13 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
RNR's Valuation (65) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as OXBR (91). This means that RNR’s stock grew similarly to OXBR’s over the last 12 months.
RNR's Profit vs Risk Rating (31) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is significantly better than the same rating for OXBR (100). This means that RNR’s stock grew significantly faster than OXBR’s over the last 12 months.
RNR's SMR Rating (91) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as OXBR (100). This means that RNR’s stock grew similarly to OXBR’s over the last 12 months.
RNR's Price Growth Rating (54) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is somewhat better than the same rating for OXBR (93). This means that RNR’s stock grew somewhat faster than OXBR’s over the last 12 months.
RNR's P/E Growth Rating (13) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is significantly better than the same rating for OXBR (100). This means that RNR’s stock grew significantly faster than OXBR’s over the last 12 months.
OXBR | RNR | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago90% | 2 days ago57% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago87% | 2 days ago55% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago87% | 2 days ago67% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago84% | 2 days ago58% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago86% | 2 days ago61% |
Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 19 days ago62% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 25 days ago86% | 4 days ago57% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago62% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago65% |
A.I.dvisor tells us that OXBR and CNFR have been poorly correlated (+13% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that OXBR and CNFR's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To OXBR | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
OXBR | 100% | -7.74% | ||
CNFR - OXBR | 13% Poorly correlated | -0.38% | ||
UFCS - OXBR | 12% Poorly correlated | -2.00% | ||
PLMR - OXBR | 12% Poorly correlated | -0.09% | ||
RNR - OXBR | 9% Poorly correlated | -0.88% | ||
ACIC - OXBR | 6% Poorly correlated | -2.07% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RNR has been closely correlated with EG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RNR jumps, then EG could also see price increases.