OWL
Price
$19.75
Change
+$0.81 (+4.28%)
Updated
Aug 8 closing price
Capitalization
12.86B
80 days until earnings call
TPG
Price
$61.70
Change
+$1.51 (+2.51%)
Updated
Aug 8 closing price
Capitalization
9.11B
93 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

OWL vs TPG

Header iconOWL vs TPG Comparison
Open Charts OWL vs TPGBanner chart's image
Blue Owl Capital
Price$19.75
Change+$0.81 (+4.28%)
Volume$8.85M
Capitalization12.86B
TPG
Price$61.70
Change+$1.51 (+2.51%)
Volume$1.72M
Capitalization9.11B
OWL vs TPG Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
OWL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TPG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
OWL vs. TPG commentary
Aug 11, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is OWL is a Hold and TPG is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 11, 2025
Stock price -- (OWL: $19.75 vs. TPG: $61.70)
Brand notoriety: OWL and TPG are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: OWL: 125% vs. TPG: 96%
Market capitalization -- OWL: $12.86B vs. TPG: $9.11B
OWL [@Investment Managers] is valued at $12.86B. TPG’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $9.11B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $174.21B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $7.7B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

OWL’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileTPG’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • OWL’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • TPG’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, TPG is a better buy in the long-term than OWL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

OWL’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TPG’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • OWL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • TPG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both OWL and TPG are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

OWL (@Investment Managers) experienced а +4.83% price change this week, while TPG (@Investment Managers) price change was +10.49% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +0.76%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.33%, and the average quarterly price growth was +26.23%.

Reported Earning Dates

OWL is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.

TPG is expected to report earnings on Nov 11, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+0.76% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
OWL($12.9B) has a higher market cap than TPG($9.11B). TPG YTD gains are higher at: -0.128 vs. OWL (-13.478). TPG has less debt than OWL: TPG (2.1B) vs OWL (3.65B). TPG (2.64B) and OWL (2.62B) have equivalent revenues.
OWLTPGOWL / TPG
Capitalization12.9B9.11B142%
EBITDA804MN/A-
Gain YTD-13.478-0.12810,559%
P/E Ratio179.55N/A-
Revenue2.62B2.64B99%
Total Cash118MN/A-
Total Debt3.65B2.1B174%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
OWLTPG
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
73%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
78%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
77%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 26 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
75%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
64%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
OWL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TPG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DGRS47.690.28
+0.59%
WisdomTree US SmallCap Qual Div Gr ETF
FIW110.980.02
+0.02%
First Trust Water ETF
LQDI26.42-0.01
-0.06%
iShares Inflation Hedged Corp Bd ETF
WINC24.19-0.02
-0.10%
Western Asset Short Duration Inc ETF
FPAS25.39-0.04
-0.15%
FPA Short Duration Government ETF

OWL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, OWL has been closely correlated with ARES. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if OWL jumps, then ARES could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OWL
1D Price
Change %
OWL100%
+4.28%
ARES - OWL
88%
Closely correlated
N/A
KKR - OWL
87%
Closely correlated
+0.34%
APO - OWL
84%
Closely correlated
+0.61%
CG - OWL
83%
Closely correlated
+1.07%
TPG - OWL
82%
Closely correlated
+2.51%
More

TPG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TPG has been closely correlated with CG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TPG jumps, then CG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TPG
1D Price
Change %
TPG100%
+2.51%
CG - TPG
85%
Closely correlated
+1.07%
KKR - TPG
84%
Closely correlated
+0.34%
ARES - TPG
83%
Closely correlated
N/A
OWL - TPG
83%
Closely correlated
+4.28%
APO - TPG
80%
Closely correlated
+0.61%
More