OWL
Price
$22.13
Change
-$0.97 (-4.20%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
8.65B
67 days until earnings call
TPG
Price
$56.63
Change
-$1.87 (-3.20%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
4.5B
73 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

OWL vs TPG

Header iconOWL vs TPG Comparison
Open Charts OWL vs TPGBanner chart's image
Blue Owl Capital
Price$22.13
Change-$0.97 (-4.20%)
Volume$6.75M
Capitalization8.65B
TPG
Price$56.63
Change-$1.87 (-3.20%)
Volume$2.85M
Capitalization4.5B
OWL vs TPG Comparison Chart
Loading...
OWL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TPG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
OWL vs. TPG commentary
Feb 23, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is OWL is a Hold and TPG is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 23, 2025
Stock price -- (OWL: $24.14 vs. TPG: $60.22)
Brand notoriety: OWL and TPG are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: OWL: 72% vs. TPG: 141%
Market capitalization -- OWL: $8.65B vs. TPG: $4.5B
OWL [@Investment Managers] is valued at $8.65B. TPG’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $4.5B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $5.99B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

OWL’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTPG’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • OWL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • TPG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, OWL is a better buy in the long-term than TPG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

OWL’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TPG’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • OWL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • TPG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both OWL and TPG are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

OWL (@Investment Managers) experienced а +2.46% price change this week, while TPG (@Investment Managers) price change was -0.94% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -0.82%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.09%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.21%.

Reported Earning Dates

OWL is expected to report earnings on May 01, 2025.

TPG is expected to report earnings on May 07, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-0.82% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
OWL($8.65B) has a higher market cap than TPG($4.5B). TPG has higher P/E ratio than OWL: TPG (434.29) vs OWL (185.70). OWL YTD gains are higher at: 3.783 vs. TPG (-4.169). TPG has less debt than OWL: TPG (1.26B) vs OWL (2B). TPG has higher revenues than OWL: TPG (2.41B) vs OWL (1.73B).
OWLTPGOWL / TPG
Capitalization8.65B4.5B192%
EBITDA633MN/A-
Gain YTD3.783-4.169-91%
P/E Ratio185.70434.2943%
Revenue1.73B2.41B72%
Total Cash104MN/A-
Total Debt2B1.26B158%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
OWLTPG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
88%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
69%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
65%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
65%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
61%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
78%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
61%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
74%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
OWL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TPG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SPY611.491.79
+0.29%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
AAPL244.47-0.13
-0.05%
Apple
GME26.97-0.03
-0.11%
GameStop Corp
BTC.X95539.550000-233.835940
-0.24%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA354.11-1.73
-0.49%
Tesla

OWL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, OWL has been closely correlated with ARES. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if OWL jumps, then ARES could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OWL
1D Price
Change %
OWL100%
+0.84%
ARES - OWL
70%
Closely correlated
+0.80%
TPG - OWL
67%
Closely correlated
+1.41%
KKR - OWL
67%
Closely correlated
+0.03%
APO - OWL
66%
Closely correlated
-0.18%
CG - OWL
63%
Loosely correlated
+3.25%
More

TPG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TPG has been closely correlated with CG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TPG jumps, then CG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TPG
1D Price
Change %
TPG100%
+1.41%
CG - TPG
72%
Closely correlated
+3.25%
KKR - TPG
70%
Closely correlated
+0.03%
ARES - TPG
70%
Closely correlated
+0.80%
BX - TPG
67%
Closely correlated
+1.15%
OWL - TPG
66%
Closely correlated
+0.84%
More