OWL
Price
$20.02
Change
-$0.29 (-1.43%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
8.65B
4 days until earnings call
SSSS
Price
$8.50
Change
-$0.16 (-1.85%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
111.81M
10 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

OWL vs SSSS

Header iconOWL vs SSSS Comparison
Open Charts OWL vs SSSSBanner chart's image
Blue Owl Capital
Price$20.02
Change-$0.29 (-1.43%)
Volume$8.93M
Capitalization8.65B
SuRo Capital
Price$8.50
Change-$0.16 (-1.85%)
Volume$114.78K
Capitalization111.81M
OWL vs SSSS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
OWL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SSSS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
OWL vs. SSSS commentary
Jul 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is OWL is a Hold and SSSS is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 27, 2025
Stock price -- (OWL: $20.02 vs. SSSS: $8.50)
Brand notoriety: OWL and SSSS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: OWL: 127% vs. SSSS: 42%
Market capitalization -- OWL: $8.65B vs. SSSS: $111.81M
OWL [@Investment Managers] is valued at $8.65B. SSSS’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $111.81M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $6.22B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

OWL’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSSSS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • OWL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SSSS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, SSSS is a better buy in the long-term than OWL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

OWL’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SSSS’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • OWL’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • SSSS’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, OWL is a better buy in the short-term than SSSS.

Price Growth

OWL (@Investment Managers) experienced а -2.86% price change this week, while SSSS (@Investment Managers) price change was -1.96% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +0.61%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.47%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.52%.

Reported Earning Dates

OWL is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2025.

SSSS is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+0.61% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
OWL($8.65B) has a higher market cap than SSSS($112M). OWL has higher P/E ratio than SSSS: OWL (185.70) vs SSSS (23.21). SSSS YTD gains are higher at: 48.726 vs. OWL (-12.295). SSSS has more cash in the bank: 260M vs. OWL (104M). SSSS has less debt than OWL: SSSS (73.7M) vs OWL (2B). OWL has higher revenues than SSSS: OWL (1.73B) vs SSSS (20.2M).
OWLSSSSOWL / SSSS
Capitalization8.65B112M7,721%
EBITDA633MN/A-
Gain YTD-12.29548.726-25%
P/E Ratio185.7023.21800%
Revenue1.73B20.2M8,574%
Total Cash104M260M40%
Total Debt2B73.7M2,715%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SSSS: Fundamental Ratings
SSSS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
67
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
29
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
70
SMR RATING
1..100
93
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
36
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
98
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
43

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
OWLSSSS
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
OWL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SSSS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JCE15.590.10
+0.65%
Nuveen Core Equity Alpha Fund
TLTW22.690.11
+0.49%
iShares 20+ Year Trs Bd Buywrt Stgy ETF
QARP54.880.26
+0.48%
Xtrackers Russell 1000 US QARP ETF
SNPD26.980.06
+0.24%
Xtrackers S&P Div Arstcrts Scrn ETF
FARX25.96N/A
N/A
Frontier Asset Absolute Return ETF

OWL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, OWL has been closely correlated with ARES. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if OWL jumps, then ARES could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OWL
1D Price
Change %
OWL100%
-1.43%
ARES - OWL
86%
Closely correlated
+3.13%
KKR - OWL
86%
Closely correlated
+1.31%
APO - OWL
84%
Closely correlated
-0.34%
TPG - OWL
83%
Closely correlated
+1.44%
CG - OWL
82%
Closely correlated
+1.83%
More

SSSS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SSSS has been loosely correlated with ARES. These tickers have moved in lockstep 40% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SSSS jumps, then ARES could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SSSS
1D Price
Change %
SSSS100%
-1.85%
ARES - SSSS
40%
Loosely correlated
+3.13%
OWL - SSSS
37%
Loosely correlated
-1.43%
APO - SSSS
37%
Loosely correlated
-0.34%
CG - SSSS
37%
Loosely correlated
+1.83%
JHG - SSSS
37%
Loosely correlated
+0.19%
More