Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
OWACX vs VIGRX
OWACX vs VIGRX Comparison
Open Charts OWACX vs VIGRX
Old Westbury All Cap Core
Price$27.34
Change+$0.17 (+0.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.46B
Vanguard Growth Index Investor
Price$245.29
Change+$1.09 (+0.45%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets328.49B
OWACX vs VIGRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
OWACX vs. VIGRX commentary
Sep 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is OWACX is a Buy and VIGRX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VIGRX has more cash in the bank: 328B vs. OWACX (3.46B). VIGRX pays higher dividends than OWACX: VIGRX (0.32) vs OWACX (0.00). OWACX was incepted earlier than VIGRX: OWACX (28 years) vs VIGRX (33 years). OWACX (0.96) is less costly to investors than VIGRX (0.17). OWACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. VIGRX (11.00). OWACX has a lower initial minimum investment than VIGRX: OWACX (1000) vs VIGRX (3000). VIGRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.93 vs. OWACX (-0.83). VIGRX return over 5 years is better than : 113.89 vs. OWACX (36.13).
| OWACX | VIGRX | OWACX / VIGRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 0.17 | 565% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 0.17 | 565% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.149 | 16.092 | 51% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 3000 | 33% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.46B | 328B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.32 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.83 | 23.93 | -3% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.87 | 117.50 | 36% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.13 | 113.89 | 32% |
| Returns for 10 years | 115.67 | 387.12 | 30% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement