Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
OWACX vs RGEBX
OWACX vs RGEBX Comparison
Open Charts OWACX vs RGEBX
Old Westbury All Cap Core
Price$27.89
Change+$0.01 (+0.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.5B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2E
Price$77.54
Change+$0.22 (+0.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets338.91B
OWACX vs RGEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
OWACX vs. RGEBX commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is OWACX is a Buy and RGEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 339B vs. OWACX (3.5B). OWACX (0.00) and RGEBX (0.00) have matching dividends . OWACX was incepted earlier than RGEBX: OWACX (28 years) vs RGEBX (11 years). RGEBX (1.08) is less costly to investors than OWACX (0.96). OWACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. RGEBX (32.00). RGEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than OWACX: RGEBX (250) vs OWACX (1000). OWACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.89 vs. RGEBX (5.18). OWACX return over 5 years is better than : 28.78 vs. RGEBX (19.19).
| OWACX | RGEBX | OWACX / RGEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 1.08 | 89% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 1.08 | 89% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.324 | 8.539 | 121% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.5B | 339B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.89 | 5.18 | 152% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.84 | 62.27 | 66% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.78 | 19.19 | 150% |
| Returns for 10 years | 112.72 | 88.81 | 127% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement