OVCHF
Price
$12.88
Change
+$0.32 (+2.55%)
Updated
Jul 2 closing price
Capitalization
44.97B
PBAM
Price
$55.00
Change
+$0.79 (+1.46%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
182.74M
12 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

OVCHF vs PBAM

Header iconOVCHF vs PBAM Comparison
Open Charts OVCHF vs PBAMBanner chart's image
Overseas Chinese Banking
Price$12.88
Change+$0.32 (+2.55%)
Volume$100
Capitalization44.97B
Private Bancorp of America
Price$55.00
Change+$0.79 (+1.46%)
Volume$8.42K
Capitalization182.74M
OVCHF vs PBAM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
OVCHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PBAM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
OVCHF vs. PBAM commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is OVCHF is a Hold and PBAM is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (OVCHF: $12.88 vs. PBAM: $55.00)
Brand notoriety: OVCHF and PBAM are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: OVCHF: 20% vs. PBAM: 351%
Market capitalization -- OVCHF: $44.97B vs. PBAM: $182.74M
OVCHF [@Regional Banks] is valued at $44.97B. PBAM’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $182.74M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

OVCHF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whilePBAM’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • OVCHF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • PBAM’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, both OVCHF and PBAM are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

OVCHF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PBAM’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • OVCHF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • PBAM’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PBAM is a better buy in the short-term than OVCHF.

Price Growth

OVCHF (@Regional Banks) experienced а +2.52% price change this week, while PBAM (@Regional Banks) price change was +2.15% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +2.86%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.71%.

Reported Earning Dates

PBAM is expected to report earnings on Jul 18, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+2.86% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
OVCHF($45B) has a higher market cap than PBAM($183M). OVCHF has higher P/E ratio than PBAM: OVCHF (7.29) vs PBAM (4.91). OVCHF YTD gains are higher at: 4.929 vs. PBAM (-4.745). PBAM has less debt than OVCHF: PBAM (210M) vs OVCHF (18.2B). OVCHF has higher revenues than PBAM: OVCHF (12.3B) vs PBAM (88.7M).
OVCHFPBAMOVCHF / PBAM
Capitalization45B183M24,590%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD4.929-4.745-104%
P/E Ratio7.294.91149%
Revenue12.3B88.7M13,867%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt18.2B210M8,667%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
OVCHF vs PBAM: Fundamental Ratings
OVCHF
PBAM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
75
Overvalued
74
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
124
SMR RATING
1..100
528
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5451
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4016
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PBAM's Valuation (74) in the null industry is in the same range as OVCHF (75). This means that PBAM’s stock grew similarly to OVCHF’s over the last 12 months.

PBAM's Profit vs Risk Rating (4) in the null industry is in the same range as OVCHF (12). This means that PBAM’s stock grew similarly to OVCHF’s over the last 12 months.

OVCHF's SMR Rating (5) in the null industry is in the same range as PBAM (28). This means that OVCHF’s stock grew similarly to PBAM’s over the last 12 months.

PBAM's Price Growth Rating (51) in the null industry is in the same range as OVCHF (54). This means that PBAM’s stock grew similarly to OVCHF’s over the last 12 months.

PBAM's P/E Growth Rating (16) in the null industry is in the same range as OVCHF (40). This means that PBAM’s stock grew similarly to OVCHF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
OVCHFPBAM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
38%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
39%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
33%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
45%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
57%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
29%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
56%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
36%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
50%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
26%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
49%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
56%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
36%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
30%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
21%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
49%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
OVCHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PBAM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DNLVX20.840.14
+0.68%
Dunham Large Cap Value N
CSSCX20.170.12
+0.60%
Columbia Small Cap Value I C
HBFBX12.220.02
+0.16%
Hennessy Balanced Investor
AAIEX18.460.01
+0.05%
American Beacon International Eq R5
TRERX16.34-0.03
-0.18%
Nuveen International Eq Retire

OVCHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that OVCHF and CRZBF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that OVCHF and CRZBF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OVCHF
1D Price
Change %
OVCHF100%
N/A
CRZBF - OVCHF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PBAM - OVCHF
5%
Poorly correlated
+1.46%
ORBN - OVCHF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
OTPBF - OVCHF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
OSBK - OVCHF
-2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

PBAM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PBAM and BOTJ have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PBAM and BOTJ's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PBAM
1D Price
Change %
PBAM100%
+1.46%
BOTJ - PBAM
32%
Poorly correlated
-2.73%
SQCF - PBAM
30%
Poorly correlated
+0.07%
PBHC - PBAM
30%
Poorly correlated
+0.53%
ANDC - PBAM
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FNWD - PBAM
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.42%
More