OUKPF
Price
Loading...
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Loading...
Capitalization
14.3B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SHKLY
Price
Loading...
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Loading...
Capitalization
9.56B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

OUKPF vs SHKLY

Header iconOUKPF vs SHKLY Comparison
Open Charts OUKPF vs SHKLYBanner chart's image
Metso OYJ
PriceLoading...
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$656
Capitalization14.3B
Sinotruk Hong Kong
PriceLoading...
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$500
Capitalization9.56B
OUKPF vs SHKLY Comparison Chart in %
OUKPF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
OUKPF vs. SHKLY commentary
Dec 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is OUKPF is a Buy and SHKLY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 28, 2025
Stock price -- (OUKPF: $10.56 vs. SHKLY: $141.82)
Brand notoriety: OUKPF and SHKLY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Trucks/Construction/Farm Machinery industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: OUKPF: 100% vs. SHKLY: 100%
Market capitalization -- OUKPF: $14.3B vs. SHKLY: $9.56B
OUKPF [@Trucks/Construction/Farm Machinery] is valued at $14.3B. SHKLY’s [@Trucks/Construction/Farm Machinery] market capitalization is $9.56B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Trucks/Construction/Farm Machinery] industry ranges from $272.83B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Trucks/Construction/Farm Machinery] industry is $17.22B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

OUKPF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSHKLY’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • OUKPF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SHKLY’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, SHKLY is a better buy in the long-term than OUKPF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

OUKPF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • OUKPF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 0 bearish.

Price Growth

OUKPF (@Trucks/Construction/Farm Machinery) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while SHKLY (@Trucks/Construction/Farm Machinery) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Trucks/Construction/Farm Machinery industry was -0.45%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.85%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.52%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Trucks/Construction/Farm Machinery (-0.45% weekly)

The industry designs and builds agricultural, construction and other large commercial and transportation equipment. Tractors, planters and harvesters, as well as rock-crushing, railroad, demolition and other construction implements are produced by this industry. Rapid urbanization and industrialization has been bolstering the expansion of the construction sector in the past few decades, thereby boosting demand for heavy equipment businesses. Caterpillar Inc., Deere & Company and Cummins Inc (Ex. Cummins Engine Inc) are some prominent companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
OUKPF($14.3B) has a higher market cap than SHKLY($9.56B). OUKPF has higher P/E ratio than SHKLY: OUKPF (16.64) vs SHKLY (9.55). SHKLY YTD gains are higher at: 20.102 vs. OUKPF (17.913). SHKLY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 9.72B vs. OUKPF (883M). SHKLY has higher revenues than OUKPF: SHKLY (95.1B) vs OUKPF (4.94B).
OUKPFSHKLYOUKPF / SHKLY
Capitalization14.3B9.56B150%
EBITDA883M9.72B9%
Gain YTD17.91320.10289%
P/E Ratio16.649.55174%
Revenue4.94B95.1B5%
Total Cash461MN/A-
Total Debt1.6BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
OUKPF vs SHKLY: Fundamental Ratings
OUKPF
SHKLY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4850
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
80
Overvalued
5
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6959
SMR RATING
1..100
4726
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5450
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2525
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
75n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SHKLY's Valuation (5) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for OUKPF (80). This means that SHKLY’s stock grew significantly faster than OUKPF’s over the last 12 months.

SHKLY's Profit vs Risk Rating (59) in the null industry is in the same range as OUKPF (69). This means that SHKLY’s stock grew similarly to OUKPF’s over the last 12 months.

SHKLY's SMR Rating (26) in the null industry is in the same range as OUKPF (47). This means that SHKLY’s stock grew similarly to OUKPF’s over the last 12 months.

SHKLY's Price Growth Rating (50) in the null industry is in the same range as OUKPF (54). This means that SHKLY’s stock grew similarly to OUKPF’s over the last 12 months.

SHKLY's P/E Growth Rating (25) in the null industry is in the same range as OUKPF (25). This means that SHKLY’s stock grew similarly to OUKPF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
OUKPFSHKLY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
26%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
24%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
OUKPF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ZAPR25.800.01
+0.04%
Innovator Equity Dfnd Prt ETF -1 Yr Apr
DAPR39.330.01
+0.02%
FT Vest US Equity Dp Bffr ETF Apr
IWFG53.99N/A
N/A
NYLI Winslow Focused Large Cap Gr ETF
JUNP30.59N/A
N/A
PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - Jun
IMCB83.92-0.04
-0.05%
iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF

OUKPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that OUKPF and SNYYF have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that OUKPF and SNYYF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OUKPF
1D Price
Change %
OUKPF100%
N/A
SNYYF - OUKPF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
VOLVF - OUKPF
25%
Poorly correlated
-4.17%
OUKPY - OUKPF
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.57%
KUBTF - OUKPF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KMTUF - OUKPF
4%
Poorly correlated
+2.40%
More

SHKLY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SHKLY and OUKPY have been poorly correlated (+9% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SHKLY and OUKPY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SHKLY
1D Price
Change %
SHKLY100%
N/A
OUKPY - SHKLY
9%
Poorly correlated
-0.57%
SNYYF - SHKLY
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
OUKPF - SHKLY
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PLFRF - SHKLY
-1%
Poorly correlated
N/A