OTGLY
Price
$17.25
Change
+$0.10 (+0.58%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
6.85B
PMCUF
Price
$194.76
Change
+$4.51 (+2.37%)
Updated
Sep 4 closing price
Capitalization
20.4B
Interact to see
Advertisement

OTGLY vs PMCUF

Header iconOTGLY vs PMCUF Comparison
Open Charts OTGLY vs PMCUFBanner chart's image
CD Projekt SA
Price$17.25
Change+$0.10 (+0.58%)
Volume$5K
Capitalization6.85B
Pro Medicus
Price$194.76
Change+$4.51 (+2.37%)
Volume$35
Capitalization20.4B
OTGLY vs PMCUF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
OTGLY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PMCUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
OTGLY vs. PMCUF commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is OTGLY is a Hold and PMCUF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (OTGLY: $17.25 vs. PMCUF: $194.76)
Brand notoriety: OTGLY and PMCUF are both not notable
OTGLY represents the Electronics/Appliances, while PMCUF is part of the Services to the Health Industry industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: OTGLY: 46% vs. PMCUF: 10%
Market capitalization -- OTGLY: $6.85B vs. PMCUF: $20.4B
OTGLY [@Electronics/Appliances] is valued at $6.85B. PMCUF’s [@Services to the Health Industry] market capitalization is $20.4B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Electronics/Appliances] industry ranges from $403.7B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Services to the Health Industry] industry ranges from $44.74B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Electronics/Appliances] industry is $12.46B. The average market capitalization across the [@Services to the Health Industry] industry is $2.24B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

OTGLY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePMCUF’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • OTGLY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • PMCUF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, PMCUF is a better buy in the long-term than OTGLY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

OTGLY’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PMCUF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • OTGLY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • PMCUF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PMCUF is a better buy in the short-term than OTGLY.

Price Growth

OTGLY (@Electronics/Appliances) experienced а -1.43% price change this week, while PMCUF (@Services to the Health Industry) price change was -2.50% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronics/Appliances industry was -2.44%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.22%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.77%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Services to the Health Industry industry was -2.30%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.52%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.21%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Electronics/Appliances (-2.44% weekly)

TVs, telephones, washing machines, home speakers and even home-office equipment like computers and printers…the list is virtually endless when it comes to consumer electronics and appliances. And, with ‘smarthomes’ increasingly becoming the reality, we could see a sharp surge in high-tech gadgets (including robotic appliances) making their way into our homes– and therefore spelling plenty opportunities in the related industries. Consumers account for 70% of US GDP, and their purchases of high-functioning electronics could make significant dents in the economy’s health. Sony Corp., Whirlpool and iRobot are some of the major consumer electronics/appliances makers.

@Services to the Health Industry (-2.30% weekly)

This industry comprises companies that provide services, such as equipment sterilization, research, physician management systems and consulting, that support the healthcare/medical industry. Examples of such companies include Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings, which operates one of the largest clinical laboratory networks in the world; Quest Diagnostics Inc., which is a clinical laboratory; and Syneos Health, which is a major clinical research organization.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PMCUF($20.4B) has a higher market cap than OTGLY($6.85B). PMCUF has higher P/E ratio than OTGLY: PMCUF (270.31) vs OTGLY (55.71). OTGLY YTD gains are higher at: 50.821 vs. PMCUF (25.433).
OTGLYPMCUFOTGLY / PMCUF
Capitalization6.85B20.4B34%
EBITDAN/A165M-
Gain YTD50.82125.433200%
P/E Ratio55.71270.3121%
RevenueN/A213M-
Total CashN/A209M-
Total DebtN/A2.26M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PMCUF: Fundamental Ratings
PMCUF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
86
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
97
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
20
SMR RATING
1..100
19
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
44
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
18
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
OTGLYPMCUF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
47%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
54%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
79%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
52%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
41%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
74%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
78%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
44%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
OTGLY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PMCUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GSIT2.93N/A
N/A
GSI Technology
OCTO1.45N/A
N/A
Eightco Holdings Inc
ETON17.67-0.20
-1.12%
Eton Pharmaceuticals
WYNN120.90-1.99
-1.62%
Wynn Resorts Limited
UAA5.14-0.12
-2.28%
Under Armour

OTGLY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that OTGLY and MDB have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that OTGLY and MDB's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OTGLY
1D Price
Change %
OTGLY100%
+0.58%
MDB - OTGLY
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.84%
SGPYY - OTGLY
20%
Poorly correlated
+1.58%
OCLCF - OTGLY
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PMCUF - OTGLY
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
OTGLF - OTGLY
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

PMCUF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PMCUF has been loosely correlated with BMBL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PMCUF jumps, then BMBL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PMCUF
1D Price
Change %
PMCUF100%
N/A
BMBL - PMCUF
34%
Loosely correlated
+3.72%
OCLCF - PMCUF
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TMSNY - PMCUF
30%
Poorly correlated
-12.27%
DAVA - PMCUF
27%
Poorly correlated
+2.11%
FIVN - PMCUF
24%
Poorly correlated
+1.52%
More