OTGLF
Price
$45.00
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 14 closing price
SMAR
Price
$55.85
Change
-$0.01 (-0.02%)
Updated
Nov 15, 03:46 PM (EDT)
21 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

OTGLF vs SMAR

Header iconOTGLF vs SMAR Comparison
Open Charts OTGLF vs SMARBanner chart's image
CD Projekt SA
Price$45.00
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$1K
CapitalizationN/A
Smartsheet
Price$55.85
Change-$0.01 (-0.02%)
Volume$666
CapitalizationN/A
OTGLF vs SMAR Comparison Chart
Loading...
SMAR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
OTGLF vs. SMAR commentary
Nov 15, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is OTGLF is a Hold and SMAR is a StrongBuy.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 15, 2024
Stock price -- (OTGLF: $45.00 vs. SMAR: $55.86)
Brand notoriety: OTGLF and SMAR are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: OTGLF: 108% vs. SMAR: 47%
Market capitalization -- OTGLF: $4.08B vs. SMAR: $5.29B
OTGLF [@Packaged Software] is valued at $4.08B. SMAR’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $5.29B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $3.15T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $11.37B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

OTGLF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSMAR’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • OTGLF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SMAR’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, OTGLF is a better buy in the long-term than SMAR.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SMAR’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • SMAR’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

OTGLF (@Packaged Software) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while SMAR (@Packaged Software) price change was -0.18% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -1.61%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.61%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.48%.

Reported Earning Dates

SMAR is expected to report earnings on Mar 18, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (-1.61% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMAR($5.29B) has a higher market cap than OTGLF($4.08B). OTGLF YTD gains are higher at: 60.714 vs. SMAR (16.813). OTGLF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 503M vs. SMAR (-93.27M). OTGLF has more cash in the bank: 921M vs. SMAR (629M). OTGLF has less debt than SMAR: OTGLF (46.9M) vs SMAR (49.8M). SMAR has higher revenues than OTGLF: SMAR (958M) vs OTGLF (911M).
OTGLFSMAROTGLF / SMAR
Capitalization4.08B5.29B77%
EBITDA503M-93.27M-539%
Gain YTD60.71416.813361%
P/E Ratio45.25N/A-
Revenue911M958M95%
Total Cash921M629M146%
Total Debt46.9M49.8M94%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
OTGLF vs SMAR: Fundamental Ratings
OTGLF
SMAR
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5070
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
45
Fair valued
63
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10066
SMR RATING
1..100
5394
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4144
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
28100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5095

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

OTGLF's Valuation (45) in the null industry is in the same range as SMAR (63) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that OTGLF’s stock grew similarly to SMAR’s over the last 12 months.

SMAR's Profit vs Risk Rating (66) in the Packaged Software industry is somewhat better than the same rating for OTGLF (100) in the null industry. This means that SMAR’s stock grew somewhat faster than OTGLF’s over the last 12 months.

OTGLF's SMR Rating (53) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SMAR (94) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that OTGLF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SMAR’s over the last 12 months.

OTGLF's Price Growth Rating (41) in the null industry is in the same range as SMAR (44) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that OTGLF’s stock grew similarly to SMAR’s over the last 12 months.

OTGLF's P/E Growth Rating (28) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for SMAR (100) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that OTGLF’s stock grew significantly faster than SMAR’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SMAR
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
72%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
SMAR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME27.370.91
+3.44%
GameStop Corp
AAPL228.223.10
+1.38%
Apple
SPY593.35-3.84
-0.64%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
BTC.X87250.430000-3333.734400
-3.68%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA311.18-19.06
-5.77%
Tesla

OTGLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that OTGLF and STBEF have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that OTGLF and STBEF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OTGLF
1D Price
Change %
OTGLF100%
N/A
STBEF - OTGLF
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SMAR - OTGLF
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RTC - OTGLF
30%
Poorly correlated
+3.01%
CMDXF - OTGLF
29%
Poorly correlated
-7.47%
CFLT - OTGLF
24%
Poorly correlated
-1.62%
More

SMAR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SMAR has been loosely correlated with INTU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SMAR jumps, then INTU could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SMAR
1D Price
Change %
SMAR100%
N/A
INTU - SMAR
53%
Loosely correlated
-0.78%
CRM - SMAR
49%
Loosely correlated
-2.95%
ASAN - SMAR
48%
Loosely correlated
-3.13%
IOT - SMAR
44%
Loosely correlated
-3.69%
PATH - SMAR
43%
Loosely correlated
-6.58%
More