Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
OTFCX vs RGEBX
OTFCX vs RGEBX Comparison
Open Charts OTFCX vs RGEBX
Invesco Discovery Large Cap C
Price$37.12
Change-$11.11 (-23.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.92B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2E
Price$75.85
Change-$9.36 (-10.98%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets335.97B
OTFCX vs RGEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
OTFCX vs. RGEBX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is OTFCX is a StrongBuy and RGEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 336B vs. OTFCX (5.92B). OTFCX (0.00) and RGEBX (0.00) have matching dividends . OTFCX was incepted earlier than RGEBX: OTFCX (32 years) vs RGEBX (11 years). OTFCX (1.70) is less costly to investors than RGEBX (1.08). OTFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 63.00 vs. RGEBX (32.00). RGEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than OTFCX: RGEBX (250) vs OTFCX (1000). RGEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.80 vs. OTFCX (-13.89). RGEBX return over 5 years is better than : 9.88 vs. OTFCX (-23.70).
| OTFCX | RGEBX | OTFCX / RGEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.70 | 1.08 | 157% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.70 | 1.08 | 157% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.749 | -1.057 | 71% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.92B | 336B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -13.89 | 1.80 | -773% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.87 | 41.63 | 98% |
| Returns for 5 years | -23.70 | 9.88 | -240% |
| Returns for 10 years | 0.08 | 110.02 | 0% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers