Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
OTFCX vs RGEBX
OTFCX vs RGEBX Comparison
Open Charts OTFCX vs RGEBX
Invesco Discovery Large Cap C
Price$45.72
Change-$0.09 (-0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.1B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2E
Price$81.40
Change-$0.06 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets329.22B
OTFCX vs RGEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
OTFCX vs. RGEBX commentary
Aug 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is OTFCX is a Buy and RGEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 329B vs. OTFCX (6.1B). OTFCX (0.00) and RGEBX (0.00) have matching dividends . OTFCX was incepted earlier than RGEBX: OTFCX (32 years) vs RGEBX (11 years). OTFCX (1.71) is less costly to investors than RGEBX (1.09). OTFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 55.00 vs. RGEBX (25.00). RGEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than OTFCX: RGEBX (250) vs OTFCX (1000). RGEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.85 vs. OTFCX (12.86). RGEBX return over 5 years is better than : 40.64 vs. OTFCX (5.18).
| OTFCX | RGEBX | OTFCX / RGEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.71 | 1.09 | 157% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.71 | 1.09 | 157% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.091 | 13.942 | 65% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.1B | 329B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.86 | 13.85 | 93% |
| Returns for 3 years | 51.84 | 40.38 | 128% |
| Returns for 5 years | 5.18 | 40.64 | 13% |
| Returns for 10 years | -11.70 | 79.50 | -15% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement