Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
OTFCX vs RGEBX
OTFCX vs RGEBX Comparison
Open Charts OTFCX vs RGEBX
Invesco Discovery Large Cap C
Price$38.05
Change-$0.01 (-0.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.14B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2E
Price$77.54
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets338.91B
OTFCX vs RGEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
OTFCX vs. RGEBX commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is OTFCX is a Hold and RGEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 339B vs. OTFCX (6.14B). OTFCX (0.00) and RGEBX (0.00) have matching dividends . OTFCX was incepted earlier than RGEBX: OTFCX (32 years) vs RGEBX (11 years). OTFCX (1.71) is less costly to investors than RGEBX (1.08). OTFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 63.00 vs. RGEBX (32.00). RGEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than OTFCX: RGEBX (250) vs OTFCX (1000). RGEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.18 vs. OTFCX (-12.53). RGEBX return over 5 years is better than : 19.19 vs. OTFCX (-18.52).
| OTFCX | RGEBX | OTFCX / RGEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.71 | 1.08 | 158% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.71 | 1.08 | 158% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -9.186 | 8.539 | -108% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.14B | 339B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -12.53 | 5.18 | -242% |
| Returns for 3 years | 53.04 | 62.27 | 85% |
| Returns for 5 years | -18.52 | 19.19 | -96% |
| Returns for 10 years | -12.06 | 88.81 | -14% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement