Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
OTFCX vs RGAHX
OTFCX vs RGAHX Comparison
Open Charts OTFCX vs RGAHX
Invesco Discovery Large Cap C
Price$37.12
Change-$11.11 (-23.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.92B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R5E
Price$78.44
Change-$9.61 (-10.91%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets335.97B
OTFCX vs RGAHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
OTFCX vs. RGAHX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is OTFCX is a StrongBuy and RGAHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAHX has more cash in the bank: 336B vs. OTFCX (5.92B). RGAHX pays higher dividends than OTFCX: RGAHX (0.43) vs OTFCX (0.00). OTFCX was incepted earlier than RGAHX: OTFCX (32 years) vs RGAHX (10 years). OTFCX (1.70) is less costly to investors than RGAHX (0.44). OTFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 63.00 vs. RGAHX (32.00). RGAHX has a lower initial minimum investment than OTFCX: RGAHX (250) vs OTFCX (1000). RGAHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.79 vs. OTFCX (-13.89). RGAHX return over 5 years is better than : 13.96 vs. OTFCX (-23.70).
| OTFCX | RGAHX | OTFCX / RGAHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.70 | 0.44 | 386% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.70 | 0.44 | 386% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.749 | -1.010 | 74% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.92B | 336B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.43 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -13.89 | 2.79 | -497% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.87 | 45.40 | 90% |
| Returns for 5 years | -23.70 | 13.96 | -170% |
| Returns for 10 years | 0.08 | 119.50 | 0% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers