Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
OTFCX vs RGACX
OTFCX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts OTFCX vs RGACX
Invesco Discovery Large Cap C
Price$47.26
Change+$0.14 (+0.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.23B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$84.36
Change+$0.32 (+0.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets335.66B
OTFCX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
OTFCX vs. RGACX commentary
Sep 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is OTFCX is a Buy and RGACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 336B vs. OTFCX (6.23B). RGACX pays higher dividends than OTFCX: RGACX (0.07) vs OTFCX (0.00). OTFCX was incepted earlier than RGACX: OTFCX (32 years) vs RGACX (23 years). OTFCX (1.71) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.94). OTFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 55.00 vs. RGACX (25.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than OTFCX: RGACX (250) vs OTFCX (1000). OTFCX (12.32) and RGACX (12.22) have marching annual gain over last year. RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 45.63 vs. OTFCX (9.50).
| OTFCX | RGACX | OTFCX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.71 | 0.94 | 182% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.71 | 0.94 | 182% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.431 | 17.183 | 72% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.23B | 336B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.07 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.32 | 12.22 | 101% |
| Returns for 3 years | 84.86 | 71.26 | 119% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.50 | 45.63 | 21% |
| Returns for 10 years | 3.86 | 111.15 | 3% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers