Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
OTFCX vs RGACX
OTFCX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts OTFCX vs RGACX
Invesco Discovery Large Cap C
Price$45.77
Change-$0.10 (-0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.08B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$83.16
Change+$0.19 (+0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets332.38B
OTFCX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
OTFCX vs. RGACX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is OTFCX is a Buy and RGACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 332B vs. OTFCX (6.08B). RGACX pays higher dividends than OTFCX: RGACX (0.07) vs OTFCX (0.00). OTFCX was incepted earlier than RGACX: OTFCX (32 years) vs RGACX (23 years). OTFCX (1.71) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.94). OTFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 55.00 vs. RGACX (25.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than OTFCX: RGACX (250) vs OTFCX (1000). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.83 vs. OTFCX (16.26). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 40.02 vs. OTFCX (3.09).
| OTFCX | RGACX | OTFCX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.71 | 0.94 | 182% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.71 | 0.94 | 182% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.210 | 15.516 | 59% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.08B | 332B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.07 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.26 | 17.83 | 91% |
| Returns for 3 years | 68.77 | 58.53 | 117% |
| Returns for 5 years | 3.09 | 40.02 | 8% |
| Returns for 10 years | -5.80 | 95.93 | -6% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement