Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
OTCNX vs RGAHX
OTCNX vs RGAHX Comparison
Open Charts OTCNX vs RGAHX
Invesco Discovery Large Cap R
Price$72.17
Change-$12.31 (-14.57%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.99B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R5E
Price$78.44
Change-$9.61 (-10.91%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets335.97B
OTCNX vs RGAHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
OTCNX vs. RGAHX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is OTCNX is a StrongBuy and RGAHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAHX has more cash in the bank: 336B vs. OTCNX (5.99B). RGAHX pays higher dividends than OTCNX: RGAHX (0.43) vs OTCNX (0.00). OTCNX was incepted earlier than RGAHX: OTCNX (25 years) vs RGAHX (10 years). OTCNX (1.20) is less costly to investors than RGAHX (0.44). OTCNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 63.00 vs. RGAHX (32.00). RGAHX has a lower initial minimum investment than OTCNX: RGAHX (250) vs OTCNX (1000). RGAHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.79 vs. OTCNX (-3.65). RGAHX return over 5 years is better than : 13.96 vs. OTCNX (7.13).
| OTCNX | RGAHX | OTCNX / RGAHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 0.44 | 273% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 0.44 | 273% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.743 | -1.010 | -74% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.99B | 336B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.43 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.65 | 2.79 | -131% |
| Returns for 3 years | 64.50 | 45.40 | 142% |
| Returns for 5 years | 7.13 | 13.96 | 51% |
| Returns for 10 years | 64.76 | 119.50 | 54% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers