Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
OTCNX vs RGACX
OTCNX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts OTCNX vs RGACX
Invesco Discovery Large Cap R
Price$80.22
Change+$0.21 (+0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.1B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$82.29
Change+$0.19 (+0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets328.93B
OTCNX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
OTCNX vs. RGACX commentary
Aug 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is OTCNX is a Buy and RGACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 329B vs. OTCNX (6.1B). RGACX pays higher dividends than OTCNX: RGACX (0.07) vs OTCNX (0.00). OTCNX was incepted earlier than RGACX: OTCNX (24 years) vs RGACX (23 years). OTCNX (1.21) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.94). OTCNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 55.00 vs. RGACX (25.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than OTCNX: RGACX (250) vs OTCNX (1000). OTCNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.35 vs. RGACX (14.41). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 40.92 vs. OTCNX (30.59).
| OTCNX | RGACX | OTCNX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.21 | 0.94 | 129% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.21 | 0.94 | 129% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.725 | 14.308 | 68% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.1B | 329B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.07 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.35 | 14.41 | 113% |
| Returns for 3 years | 62.09 | 45.56 | 136% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.59 | 40.92 | 75% |
| Returns for 10 years | 42.84 | 96.18 | 45% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers