Advertisement
OSW vs PTON
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is OSW is a Hold and PTON is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
OSW’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePTON’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- OSW’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- PTON’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
OSW’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PTON’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
- OSW’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
- PTON’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
OSW (@Recreational Products) experienced а -1.08% price change this week, while PTON (@Recreational Products) price change was +7.76% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Recreational Products industry was +1.94%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.20%, and the average quarterly price growth was +24.64%.
Reported Earning Dates
OSW is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.
PTON is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Recreational Products (+1.94% weekly)The Leisure and Recreation Products industry includes companies offering recreational goods/services such as video games, swimming pools, golf courses, boats, outdoor spaces etc. Since these are mainly geared towards consumers, strong employment conditions and healthy incomes generally augur well for the recreational products industry. Some of the largest market caps in this space belong to video game developers (e.g. Activision Blizzard, Electronic Arts and Take-two Interactive), and toy /board game makers (like Hasbro).
| OSW | PTON | OSW / PTON | |
| Capitalization | 2.06B | 3.06B | 67% |
| EBITDA | 107M | 109M | 98% |
| Gain YTD | 1.639 | -13.793 | -12% |
| P/E Ratio | 29.56 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 919M | 2.49B | 37% |
| Total Cash | 35M | 1.04B | 3% |
| Total Debt | 109M | 1.98B | 6% |
OSW | PTON | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 63 | 70 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 40 Fair valued | 95 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 26 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 59 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 58 | 45 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 59 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 90 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
OSW's Valuation (40) in the Other Consumer Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PTON (95) in the null industry. This means that OSW’s stock grew somewhat faster than PTON’s over the last 12 months.
OSW's Profit vs Risk Rating (26) in the Other Consumer Services industry is significantly better than the same rating for PTON (100) in the null industry. This means that OSW’s stock grew significantly faster than PTON’s over the last 12 months.
OSW's SMR Rating (59) in the Other Consumer Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PTON (100) in the null industry. This means that OSW’s stock grew somewhat faster than PTON’s over the last 12 months.
PTON's Price Growth Rating (45) in the null industry is in the same range as OSW (58) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that PTON’s stock grew similarly to OSW’s over the last 12 months.
OSW's P/E Growth Rating (59) in the Other Consumer Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PTON (100) in the null industry. This means that OSW’s stock grew somewhat faster than PTON’s over the last 12 months.
| OSW | PTON | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 73% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 89% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 88% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 64% | 2 days ago 80% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 64% | 2 days ago 87% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 78% | 5 days ago 83% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 64% | 2 days ago 88% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 78% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 63% | 2 days ago 81% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| JVMCX | 27.55 | 0.12 | +0.44% |
| JHancock Disciplined Value Mid Cap C | |||
| PAECX | 20.10 | 0.06 | +0.30% |
| Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Gr C | |||
| LZUSX | 17.90 | 0.05 | +0.28% |
| Lazard US Equity Focus Instl | |||
| JUSQX | 19.26 | -0.11 | -0.57% |
| JPMorgan US Small Company R4 | |||
| WCMSX | 25.42 | -0.23 | -0.90% |
| WCM International Small Cap Growth Instl | |||
OSW and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, OSW has been loosely correlated with PRKS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if OSW jumps, then PRKS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To OSW | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OSW | 100% | +0.95% | ||
| PRKS - OSW | 53% Loosely correlated | +0.33% | ||
| JAKK - OSW | 51% Loosely correlated | -0.98% | ||
| AS - OSW | 50% Loosely correlated | +0.62% | ||
| LTH - OSW | 49% Loosely correlated | +3.13% | ||
| FNKO - OSW | 47% Loosely correlated | -5.16% | ||
More | ||||
PTON and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PTON has been loosely correlated with JAKK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 44% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PTON jumps, then JAKK could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PTON | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PTON | 100% | -0.27% | ||
| JAKK - PTON | 44% Loosely correlated | -0.98% | ||
| AS - PTON | 41% Loosely correlated | +0.62% | ||
| OSW - PTON | 34% Loosely correlated | +0.95% | ||
| CLAR - PTON | 34% Loosely correlated | -1.50% | ||
| LTH - PTON | 34% Loosely correlated | +3.13% | ||
More | ||||