It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
OSW’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePLNT’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
OSW’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PLNT’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
OSW (@Recreational Products) experienced а -1.16% price change this week, while PLNT (@Recreational Products) price change was +2.17% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Recreational Products industry was -3.90%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.37%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.39%.
OSW is expected to report earnings on Feb 26, 2025.
PLNT is expected to report earnings on Feb 20, 2025.
The Leisure and Recreation Products industry includes companies offering recreational goods/services such as video games, swimming pools, golf courses, boats, outdoor spaces etc. Since these are mainly geared towards consumers, strong employment conditions and healthy incomes generally augur well for the recreational products industry. Some of the largest market caps in this space belong to video game developers (e.g. Activision Blizzard, Electronic Arts and Take-two Interactive), and toy /board game makers (like Hasbro).
OSW | PLNT | OSW / PLNT | |
Capitalization | 1.35B | 5.58B | 24% |
EBITDA | 38.9M | 444M | 9% |
Gain YTD | 33.614 | 31.795 | 106% |
P/E Ratio | 1333.00 | 39.55 | 3,370% |
Revenue | 794M | 1.07B | 74% |
Total Cash | 27.7M | 351M | 8% |
Total Debt | 171M | 2.37B | 7% |
OSW | PLNT | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 27 | 15 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 73 Overvalued | 93 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 76 | 51 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 69 | 12 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 39 | 38 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 37 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 2 | 75 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
OSW's Valuation (73) in the Other Consumer Services industry is in the same range as PLNT (93). This means that OSW’s stock grew similarly to PLNT’s over the last 12 months.
PLNT's Profit vs Risk Rating (51) in the Other Consumer Services industry is in the same range as OSW (76). This means that PLNT’s stock grew similarly to OSW’s over the last 12 months.
PLNT's SMR Rating (12) in the Other Consumer Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for OSW (69). This means that PLNT’s stock grew somewhat faster than OSW’s over the last 12 months.
PLNT's Price Growth Rating (38) in the Other Consumer Services industry is in the same range as OSW (39). This means that PLNT’s stock grew similarly to OSW’s over the last 12 months.
PLNT's P/E Growth Rating (37) in the Other Consumer Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for OSW (100). This means that PLNT’s stock grew somewhat faster than OSW’s over the last 12 months.
OSW | PLNT | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago78% | 1 day ago50% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago74% | 1 day ago72% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago80% | 1 day ago77% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago68% | 1 day ago74% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago68% | 1 day ago71% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago80% | 1 day ago75% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago0% | 8 days ago0% |
Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago71% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago67% | 1 day ago68% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago71% | 1 day ago85% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, OSW has been loosely correlated with CUK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if OSW jumps, then CUK could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PLNT has been loosely correlated with LTH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PLNT jumps, then LTH could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PLNT | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
PLNT | 100% | -0.64% | ||
LTH - PLNT | 47% Loosely correlated | -1.49% | ||
MCFT - PLNT | 37% Loosely correlated | -1.52% | ||
YETI - PLNT | 34% Loosely correlated | -4.75% | ||
OSW - PLNT | 32% Poorly correlated | -2.69% | ||
THO - PLNT | 29% Poorly correlated | +0.70% | ||
More |