Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
OSCV vs SMMD
OSCV vs SMMD Comparison
Open Charts OSCV vs SMMD
Opus Small Cap Value Plus ETF
Price$38.41
Change-$0.03 (-0.08%)
Volume$1.43K
Net Assets652.29M
iShares Russell 2500 ETF
Price$73.71
Change+$0.11 (+0.15%)
Volume$372
Net Assets1.66B
OSCV vs SMMD Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
OSCV vs. SMMD commentary
Sep 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is OSCV is a StrongBuy and SMMD is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMMD has more net assets: 1.66B vs. OSCV (652M). SMMD has a higher annual dividend yield than OSCV: SMMD (8.921) vs OSCV (4.434). OSCV was incepted earlier than SMMD: OSCV (7 years) vs SMMD (8 years). SMMD (0.15) has a lower expense ratio than OSCV (0.80). OSCV has a higher turnover SMMD (8.00) vs SMMD (8.00).
| OSCV | SMMD | OSCV / SMMD | |
| Gain YTD | 4.434 | 8.921 | 50% |
| Net Assets | 652M | 1.66B | 39% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 0.15 | 533% |
| Turnover | 25.00 | 8.00 | 313% |
| Yield | 1.14 | 1.28 | 89% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 8 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| OSCV | SMMD | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 80% | 4 days ago 84% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 75% | 4 days ago 89% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 76% | 4 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 83% | 4 days ago 86% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 78% | 4 days ago 86% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 80% | 4 days ago 84% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 13 days ago 82% | 4 days ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 78% | 6 days ago 83% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 74% | 4 days ago 81% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 78% | 4 days ago 85% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
OSCV and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, OSCV has been closely correlated with WTFC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if OSCV jumps, then WTFC could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To OSCV | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OSCV | 100% | -0.13% | ||
| WTFC - OSCV | 85% Closely correlated | -0.20% | ||
| SBCF - OSCV | 82% Closely correlated | -0.95% | ||
| HOMB - OSCV | 81% Closely correlated | -0.76% | ||
| GGG - OSCV | 79% Closely correlated | -0.38% | ||
| PRI - OSCV | 79% Closely correlated | -0.19% | ||
More | ||||
SMMD and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SMMD has been loosely correlated with PHM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SMMD jumps, then PHM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SMMD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SMMD | 100% | +0.60% | ||
| PHM - SMMD | 61% Loosely correlated | +2.15% | ||
| BLDR - SMMD | 61% Loosely correlated | +4.15% | ||
| PTC - SMMD | 53% Loosely correlated | +0.30% | ||
| ENTG - SMMD | 53% Loosely correlated | +2.93% | ||
| HUBB - SMMD | 37% Loosely correlated | -0.26% | ||
More | ||||