Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
OSCV vs SMMD
OSCV vs SMMD Comparison
Open Charts OSCV vs SMMD
Opus Small Cap Value Plus ETF
Price$36.78
Change-$0.07 (-0.19%)
Volume$180
Net Assets650.52M
iShares Russell 2500 ETF
Price$72.52
Change-$0.03 (-0.04%)
Volume$1.62K
Net Assets1.86B
OSCV vs SMMD Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
OSCV vs. SMMD commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is OSCV is a Hold and SMMD is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMMD has more net assets: 1.86B vs. OSCV (651M). SMMD has a higher annual dividend yield than OSCV: SMMD (7.713) vs OSCV (0.442). OSCV was incepted earlier than SMMD: OSCV (7 years) vs SMMD (8 years). SMMD (0.15) has a lower expense ratio than OSCV (0.79). OSCV has a higher turnover SMMD (8.00) vs SMMD (8.00).
| OSCV | SMMD | OSCV / SMMD | |
| Gain YTD | 0.442 | 7.713 | 6% |
| Net Assets | 651M | 1.86B | 35% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 0.15 | 527% |
| Turnover | 25.00 | 8.00 | 313% |
| Yield | 1.16 | 1.26 | 93% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 8 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| OSCV | SMMD | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 67% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 81% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 84% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 81% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 85% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 11 days ago 82% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 4 days ago 86% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 5 days ago 86% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
OSCV and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, OSCV has been closely correlated with WTFC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if OSCV jumps, then WTFC could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To OSCV | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OSCV | 100% | -0.89% | ||
| WTFC - OSCV | 84% Closely correlated | -1.89% | ||
| SBCF - OSCV | 81% Closely correlated | -2.53% | ||
| HOMB - OSCV | 80% Closely correlated | -0.73% | ||
| GGG - OSCV | 80% Closely correlated | -1.64% | ||
| FELE - OSCV | 78% Closely correlated | -1.62% | ||
More | ||||
SMMD and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SMMD has been loosely correlated with PHM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SMMD jumps, then PHM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SMMD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SMMD | 100% | -2.34% | ||
| PHM - SMMD | 61% Loosely correlated | -1.83% | ||
| BLDR - SMMD | 61% Loosely correlated | -2.38% | ||
| PTC - SMMD | 53% Loosely correlated | -2.02% | ||
| ENTG - SMMD | 53% Loosely correlated | -3.55% | ||
| HUBB - SMMD | 37% Loosely correlated | -3.39% | ||
More | ||||