OSCUF
Price
$9.75
Change
-$1.65 (-14.47%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
9.15B
SPXCF
Price
$11.90
Change
+$0.40 (+3.48%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
7.76B
Interact to see
Advertisement

OSCUF vs SPXCF

Header iconOSCUF vs SPXCF Comparison
Open Charts OSCUF vs SPXCFBanner chart's image
Japan Exchange Group
Price$9.75
Change-$1.65 (-14.47%)
Volume$432
Capitalization9.15B
Singapore Exchange
Price$11.90
Change+$0.40 (+3.48%)
Volume$2.59K
Capitalization7.76B
OSCUF vs SPXCF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
OSCUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SPXCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
OSCUF vs. SPXCF commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is OSCUF is a Hold and SPXCF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (OSCUF: $9.75 vs. SPXCF: $11.90)
Brand notoriety: OSCUF and SPXCF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: OSCUF: 77% vs. SPXCF: 73%
Market capitalization -- OSCUF: $9.15B vs. SPXCF: $7.76B
OSCUF [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $9.15B. SPXCF’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $7.76B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $12.11B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

OSCUF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSPXCF’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • OSCUF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SPXCF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, SPXCF is a better buy in the long-term than OSCUF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

OSCUF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SPXCF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • OSCUF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SPXCF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both OSCUF and SPXCF are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

OSCUF (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а -14.47% price change this week, while SPXCF (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was +4.39% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +24.10%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +14.99%, and the average quarterly price growth was +112.48%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (+24.10% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
OSCUF($9.15B) has a higher market cap than SPXCF($7.76B). OSCUF has higher P/E ratio than SPXCF: OSCUF (27.62) vs SPXCF (20.37). SPXCF YTD gains are higher at: 32.222 vs. OSCUF (-21.371). OSCUF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 87.3B vs. SPXCF (724M). OSCUF has more cash in the bank: 211B vs. SPXCF (1.04B). SPXCF has less debt than OSCUF: SPXCF (721M) vs OSCUF (53B). OSCUF has higher revenues than SPXCF: OSCUF (134B) vs SPXCF (1.15B).
OSCUFSPXCFOSCUF / SPXCF
Capitalization9.15B7.76B118%
EBITDA87.3B724M12,058%
Gain YTD-21.37132.222-66%
P/E Ratio27.6220.37136%
Revenue134B1.15B11,662%
Total Cash211B1.04B20,386%
Total Debt53B721M7,351%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
OSCUF vs SPXCF: Fundamental Ratings
OSCUF
SPXCF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
98
Overvalued
81
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
9026
SMR RATING
1..100
6327
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7940
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8322
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
3195

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SPXCF's Valuation (81) in the null industry is in the same range as OSCUF (98). This means that SPXCF’s stock grew similarly to OSCUF’s over the last 12 months.

SPXCF's Profit vs Risk Rating (26) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for OSCUF (90). This means that SPXCF’s stock grew somewhat faster than OSCUF’s over the last 12 months.

SPXCF's SMR Rating (27) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for OSCUF (63). This means that SPXCF’s stock grew somewhat faster than OSCUF’s over the last 12 months.

SPXCF's Price Growth Rating (40) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for OSCUF (79). This means that SPXCF’s stock grew somewhat faster than OSCUF’s over the last 12 months.

SPXCF's P/E Growth Rating (22) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for OSCUF (83). This means that SPXCF’s stock grew somewhat faster than OSCUF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
OSCUFSPXCF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
46%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
45%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
45%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
31%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
44%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
39%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
45%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
31%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
OSCUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SPXCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HYXF47.290.02
+0.04%
iShares ESG Advanced Hi Yld Corp Bd ETF
MINT100.19N/A
N/A
PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ETF
BLUBF5.69N/A
N/A
Blue Ribbon Income Fund
BOE11.51-0.01
-0.09%
BlackRock Enhanced Global Dividend Trust
PSCC34.43-0.03
-0.09%
Invesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Stapl ETF

OSCUF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that OSCUF and MCQEF have been poorly correlated (+12% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that OSCUF and MCQEF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OSCUF
1D Price
Change %
OSCUF100%
-14.47%
MCQEF - OSCUF
12%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NHMAF - OSCUF
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SPXCY - OSCUF
10%
Poorly correlated
+0.21%
NPPTF - OSCUF
9%
Poorly correlated
+0.97%
NZSTF - OSCUF
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

SPXCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SPXCF and SPXCY have been poorly correlated (+19% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SPXCF and SPXCY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SPXCF
1D Price
Change %
SPXCF100%
+3.48%
SPXCY - SPXCF
19%
Poorly correlated
+0.21%
QMCI - SPXCF
12%
Poorly correlated
-3.36%
PLSQF - SPXCF
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TMXXF - SPXCF
2%
Poorly correlated
+0.29%
OSCUF - SPXCF
-1%
Poorly correlated
-14.47%
More