OSCUF
Price
$9.90
Change
-$0.02 (-0.20%)
Updated
Jul 18 closing price
Capitalization
9.15B
QMCI
Price
$0.17
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
29.86M
17 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

OSCUF vs QMCI

Header iconOSCUF vs QMCI Comparison
Open Charts OSCUF vs QMCIBanner chart's image
Japan Exchange Group
Price$9.90
Change-$0.02 (-0.20%)
Volume$1.59K
Capitalization9.15B
QuoteMedia
Price$0.17
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$7.5K
Capitalization29.86M
OSCUF vs QMCI Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
OSCUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
QMCI
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
OSCUF vs. QMCI commentary
Jul 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is OSCUF is a Hold and QMCI is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 27, 2025
Stock price -- (OSCUF: $9.90 vs. QMCI: $0.17)
Brand notoriety: OSCUF and QMCI are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: OSCUF: 135% vs. QMCI: 65%
Market capitalization -- OSCUF: $9.15B vs. QMCI: $29.86M
OSCUF [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $9.15B. QMCI’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $29.86M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $12.11B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

OSCUF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileQMCI’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • OSCUF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • QMCI’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, QMCI is a better buy in the long-term than OSCUF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

OSCUF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while QMCI’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • OSCUF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • QMCI’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, QMCI is a better buy in the short-term than OSCUF.

Price Growth

OSCUF (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while QMCI (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was +0.06% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was -2.06%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +12.75%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.79%.

Reported Earning Dates

QMCI is expected to report earnings on Aug 13, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (-2.06% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
OSCUF($9.15B) has a higher market cap than QMCI($29.9M). QMCI has higher P/E ratio than OSCUF: QMCI (95.24) vs OSCUF (27.62). QMCI YTD gains are higher at: 20.377 vs. OSCUF (-20.161). OSCUF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 87.3B vs. QMCI (2.68M). OSCUF has more cash in the bank: 211B vs. QMCI (675K). QMCI has less debt than OSCUF: QMCI (454K) vs OSCUF (53B). OSCUF has higher revenues than QMCI: OSCUF (134B) vs QMCI (18M).
OSCUFQMCIOSCUF / QMCI
Capitalization9.15B29.9M30,609%
EBITDA87.3B2.68M3,261,113%
Gain YTD-20.16120.377-99%
P/E Ratio27.6295.2429%
Revenue134B18M744,444%
Total Cash211B675K31,259,259%
Total Debt53B454K11,674,009%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
OSCUF vs QMCI: Fundamental Ratings
OSCUF
QMCI
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
98
Overvalued
96
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
8975
SMR RATING
1..100
64100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8661
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
829
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
3450

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

QMCI's Valuation (96) in the null industry is in the same range as OSCUF (98). This means that QMCI’s stock grew similarly to OSCUF’s over the last 12 months.

QMCI's Profit vs Risk Rating (75) in the null industry is in the same range as OSCUF (89). This means that QMCI’s stock grew similarly to OSCUF’s over the last 12 months.

OSCUF's SMR Rating (64) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for QMCI (100). This means that OSCUF’s stock grew somewhat faster than QMCI’s over the last 12 months.

QMCI's Price Growth Rating (61) in the null industry is in the same range as OSCUF (86). This means that QMCI’s stock grew similarly to OSCUF’s over the last 12 months.

QMCI's P/E Growth Rating (9) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for OSCUF (82). This means that QMCI’s stock grew significantly faster than OSCUF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
OSCUFQMCI
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
38%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
42%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
43%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
43%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 28 days ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 20 days ago
70%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
43%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
OSCUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
QMCI
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
XLV136.480.72
+0.53%
The Health Care Select Sector SPDR® ETF
MFSG27.360.14
+0.51%
MFS Active Growth ETF
HYRM23.460.01
+0.05%
Xtrackers Risk Managed USD HY Strat ETF
FDEM28.69-0.12
-0.42%
Fidelity Emerging Markets Mltfct ETF
AIA84.92-0.42
-0.49%
iShares Asia 50 ETF

OSCUF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that OSCUF and MCQEF have been poorly correlated (+12% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that OSCUF and MCQEF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OSCUF
1D Price
Change %
OSCUF100%
N/A
MCQEF - OSCUF
12%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NHMAF - OSCUF
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SPXCY - OSCUF
10%
Poorly correlated
-0.33%
NPPTF - OSCUF
9%
Poorly correlated
-2.43%
NZSTF - OSCUF
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

QMCI and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that QMCI and SPXCF have been poorly correlated (+12% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that QMCI and SPXCF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To QMCI
1D Price
Change %
QMCI100%
N/A
SPXCF - QMCI
12%
Poorly correlated
-0.80%
OTCM - QMCI
2%
Poorly correlated
-0.82%
SPXCY - QMCI
1%
Poorly correlated
-0.33%
PLSQF - QMCI
-2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
OSCUF - QMCI
-3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More