OSBK
Price
$38.50
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Oct 17 closing price
OVCHF
Price
$12.10
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 12 closing price
Ad is loading...

OSBK vs OVCHF

Header iconOSBK vs OVCHF Comparison
Open Charts OSBK vs OVCHFBanner chart's image
Oconee Financial
Price$38.50
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$115
CapitalizationN/A
Overseas Chinese Banking
Price$12.10
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$1.58K
CapitalizationN/A
OSBK vs OVCHF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
OSBK vs. OVCHF commentary
Nov 15, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is OSBK is a Hold and OVCHF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 15, 2024
Stock price -- (OSBK: $38.50 vs. OVCHF: $12.10)
Brand notoriety: OSBK and OVCHF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: OSBK: 22% vs. OVCHF: 250%
Market capitalization -- OSBK: $26.89M vs. OVCHF: $44.97B
OSBK [@Regional Banks] is valued at $26.89M. OVCHF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $44.97B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.86B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

OSBK’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileOVCHF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • OSBK’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • OVCHF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, OVCHF is a better buy in the long-term than OSBK.

Price Growth

OSBK (@Regional Banks) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while OVCHF (@Regional Banks) price change was +10.50% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.80%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.68%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.06%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.80% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
OVCHF($45B) has a higher market cap than OSBK($26.9M). OVCHF has higher P/E ratio than OSBK: OVCHF (7.29) vs OSBK (5.77). OSBK YTD gains are higher at: 26.303 vs. OVCHF (24.524). OSBK has less debt than OVCHF: OSBK (9.82M) vs OVCHF (18.2B). OVCHF has higher revenues than OSBK: OVCHF (12.3B) vs OSBK (22.4M).
OSBKOVCHFOSBK / OVCHF
Capitalization26.9M45B0%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD26.30324.524107%
P/E Ratio5.777.2979%
Revenue22.4M12.3B0%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt9.82M18.2B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
OVCHF: Fundamental Ratings
OVCHF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
35
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
83
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
20
SMR RATING
1..100
5
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
44
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
44
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME27.370.91
+3.44%
GameStop Corp
AAPL228.223.10
+1.38%
Apple
SPY593.35-3.84
-0.64%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
BTC.X87250.430000-3333.734400
-3.68%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA311.18-19.06
-5.77%
Tesla

OSBK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that OSBK and MCHB have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that OSBK and MCHB's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OSBK
1D Price
Change %
OSBK100%
N/A
MCHB - OSBK
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MBKL - OSBK
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GPFOF - OSBK
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IROQ - OSBK
22%
Poorly correlated
-2.59%
OXBC - OSBK
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

OVCHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that OVCHF and CRZBF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that OVCHF and CRZBF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OVCHF
1D Price
Change %
OVCHF100%
N/A
CRZBF - OVCHF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PBAM - OVCHF
5%
Poorly correlated
+0.93%
ORBN - OVCHF
2%
Poorly correlated
+2.61%
OTPBF - OVCHF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
OSBK - OVCHF
-2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More