ORZCF
Price
$0.85
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 3 closing price
Capitalization
504.36M
75 days until earnings call
RMRDF
Price
$0.46
Change
-$0.02 (-4.17%)
Updated
Sep 3 closing price
Capitalization
158.55M
Interact to see
Advertisement

ORZCF vs RMRDF

Header iconORZCF vs RMRDF Comparison
Open Charts ORZCF vs RMRDFBanner chart's image
Orezone Gold
Price$0.85
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$146.65K
Capitalization504.36M
Radisson Mining Resources
Price$0.46
Change-$0.02 (-4.17%)
Volume$350.03K
Capitalization158.55M
ORZCF vs RMRDF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
ORZCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RMRDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ORZCF vs. RMRDF commentary
Sep 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ORZCF is a StrongBuy and RMRDF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 04, 2025
Stock price -- (ORZCF: $0.85 vs. RMRDF: $0.46)
Brand notoriety: ORZCF and RMRDF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ORZCF: 110% vs. RMRDF: 104%
Market capitalization -- ORZCF: $504.36M vs. RMRDF: $158.55M
ORZCF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $504.36M. RMRDF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $158.55M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $93.2B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $2.78B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ORZCF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileRMRDF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • ORZCF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • RMRDF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, ORZCF is a better buy in the long-term than RMRDF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ORZCF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RMRDF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ORZCF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • RMRDF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both ORZCF and RMRDF are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

ORZCF (@Precious Metals) experienced а -10.85% price change this week, while RMRDF (@Precious Metals) price change was +10.59% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +5.67%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +15.85%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4955.93%.

Reported Earning Dates

ORZCF is expected to report earnings on Nov 18, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+5.67% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ORZCF($504M) has a higher market cap than RMRDF($159M). RMRDF (95.500) and ORZCF (91.195) have similar YTD gains . ORZCF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 151M vs. RMRDF (-2.03M). ORZCF has more cash in the bank: 72.6M vs. RMRDF (5.86M). ORZCF has higher revenues than RMRDF: ORZCF (338M) vs RMRDF (0).
ORZCFRMRDFORZCF / RMRDF
Capitalization504M159M317%
EBITDA151M-2.03M-7,449%
Gain YTD91.19595.50095%
P/E Ratio6.05N/A-
Revenue338M0-
Total Cash72.6M5.86M1,239%
Total Debt98.8MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ORZCF vs RMRDF: Fundamental Ratings
ORZCF
RMRDF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2427
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
51
Fair valued
95
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
8549
SMR RATING
1..100
3593
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4535
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5688
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
9085

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ORZCF's Valuation (51) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RMRDF (95). This means that ORZCF’s stock grew somewhat faster than RMRDF’s over the last 12 months.

RMRDF's Profit vs Risk Rating (49) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ORZCF (85). This means that RMRDF’s stock grew somewhat faster than ORZCF’s over the last 12 months.

ORZCF's SMR Rating (35) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RMRDF (93). This means that ORZCF’s stock grew somewhat faster than RMRDF’s over the last 12 months.

RMRDF's Price Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is in the same range as ORZCF (45). This means that RMRDF’s stock grew similarly to ORZCF’s over the last 12 months.

ORZCF's P/E Growth Rating (56) in the null industry is in the same range as RMRDF (88). This means that ORZCF’s stock grew similarly to RMRDF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ORZCFRMRDF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
84%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
84%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
89%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ORZCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RMRDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RYIAX143.041.32
+0.93%
Rydex Internet H
BGFRX13.660.09
+0.66%
William Blair Growth R6
PXEAX25.180.05
+0.20%
Impax Global Environmental Markets A
FSDPX93.26N/A
N/A
Fidelity Select Materials
DCGVX42.23-0.15
-0.35%
BNY Mellon Dynamic Value Fund C

ORZCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ORZCF has been loosely correlated with LGDTF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ORZCF jumps, then LGDTF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ORZCF
1D Price
Change %
ORZCF100%
-0.13%
LGDTF - ORZCF
37%
Loosely correlated
-3.37%
CPNFF - ORZCF
33%
Poorly correlated
+2.40%
SNWGF - ORZCF
32%
Poorly correlated
-1.33%
KNTNF - ORZCF
31%
Poorly correlated
+3.00%
TORXF - ORZCF
29%
Poorly correlated
-2.31%
More

RMRDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RMRDF and NSUPF have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RMRDF and NSUPF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RMRDF
1D Price
Change %
RMRDF100%
-3.95%
NSUPF - RMRDF
30%
Poorly correlated
-4.04%
DCHRF - RMRDF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CGLCF - RMRDF
21%
Poorly correlated
-5.16%
ORZCF - RMRDF
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.13%
RMLFF - RMRDF
10%
Poorly correlated
+4.26%
More