ORRCF
Price
$0.25
Change
-$0.02 (-7.41%)
Updated
Oct 17 closing price
Capitalization
64.2M
PBMLF
Price
$0.64
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Oct 17 closing price
Capitalization
11.13M
Interact to see
Advertisement

ORRCF vs PBMLF

Header iconORRCF vs PBMLF Comparison
Open Charts ORRCF vs PBMLFBanner chart's image
Oroco Resource
Price$0.25
Change-$0.02 (-7.41%)
Volume$384.97K
Capitalization64.2M
Pacific Booker Minerals
Price$0.64
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$2K
Capitalization11.13M
ORRCF vs PBMLF Comparison Chart in %
ORRCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PBMLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ORRCF vs. PBMLF commentary
Oct 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ORRCF is a Hold and PBMLF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 19, 2025
Stock price -- (ORRCF: $0.25 vs. PBMLF: $0.64)
Brand notoriety: ORRCF and PBMLF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ORRCF: 133% vs. PBMLF: 91%
Market capitalization -- ORRCF: $64.2M vs. PBMLF: $11.13M
ORRCF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $64.2M. PBMLF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $11.13M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.65B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ORRCF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePBMLF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • ORRCF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • PBMLF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, ORRCF is a better buy in the long-term than PBMLF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ORRCF’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PBMLF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ORRCF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • PBMLF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ORRCF is a better buy in the short-term than PBMLF.

Price Growth

ORRCF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -12.81% price change this week, while PBMLF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was -14.37% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +3.05%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +27.21%, and the average quarterly price growth was +253.12%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+3.05% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ORRCF($64.2M) has a higher market cap than PBMLF($11.1M). PBMLF YTD gains are higher at: 75.481 vs. ORRCF (37.568). PBMLF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -644.38K vs. ORRCF (-3.87M). ORRCF has more cash in the bank: 1.16M vs. PBMLF (90.2K). PBMLF has less debt than ORRCF: PBMLF (92K) vs ORRCF (436K). ORRCF (0) and PBMLF (0) have equivalent revenues.
ORRCFPBMLFORRCF / PBMLF
Capitalization64.2M11.1M578%
EBITDA-3.87M-644.38K600%
Gain YTD37.56875.48150%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash1.16M90.2K1,288%
Total Debt436K92K474%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ORRCF vs PBMLF: Fundamental Ratings
ORRCF
PBMLF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6833
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
100
Overvalued
97
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
94100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4192
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PBMLF's Valuation (97) in the null industry is in the same range as ORRCF (100). This means that PBMLF’s stock grew similarly to ORRCF’s over the last 12 months.

PBMLF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as ORRCF (100). This means that PBMLF’s stock grew similarly to ORRCF’s over the last 12 months.

ORRCF's SMR Rating (94) in the null industry is in the same range as PBMLF (100). This means that ORRCF’s stock grew similarly to PBMLF’s over the last 12 months.

ORRCF's Price Growth Rating (41) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PBMLF (92). This means that ORRCF’s stock grew somewhat faster than PBMLF’s over the last 12 months.

ORRCF's P/E Growth Rating (6) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for PBMLF (100). This means that ORRCF’s stock grew significantly faster than PBMLF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ORRCFPBMLF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
74%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ORRCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PBMLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PRO22.95-0.01
-0.04%
Pros Holdings
NET210.01-1.39
-0.66%
Cloudflare
XPOF6.87-0.21
-2.97%
Xponential Fitness
FEMY0.70-0.04
-5.67%
Femasys
BTDR24.02-1.86
-7.19%
Bitdeer Technologies Group

ORRCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ORRCF and HANNF have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ORRCF and HANNF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ORRCF
1D Price
Change %
ORRCF100%
-4.54%
HANNF - ORRCF
22%
Poorly correlated
+1.34%
IONR - ORRCF
20%
Poorly correlated
-8.42%
SOUHY - ORRCF
20%
Poorly correlated
+1.93%
EEMMF - ORRCF
20%
Poorly correlated
-7.48%
SNLGF - ORRCF
20%
Poorly correlated
-2.23%
More

PBMLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PBMLF and DBLVF have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PBMLF and DBLVF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PBMLF
1D Price
Change %
PBMLF100%
-0.08%
DBLVF - PBMLF
20%
Poorly correlated
-2.81%
ORMNF - PBMLF
4%
Poorly correlated
-6.96%
PEMSF - PBMLF
-0%
Poorly correlated
+2.86%
PGEZF - PBMLF
-0%
Poorly correlated
-13.15%
ORRCF - PBMLF
-2%
Poorly correlated
-4.54%
More