OPY
Price
$90.78
Change
+$4.19 (+4.84%)
Updated
Feb 4 closing price
Capitalization
961.08M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SF
Price
$128.87
Change
+$4.59 (+3.69%)
Updated
Feb 4 closing price
Capitalization
13.1B
83 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

OPY vs SF

Header iconOPY vs SF Comparison
Open Charts OPY vs SFBanner chart's image
Oppenheimer Holdings
Price$90.78
Change+$4.19 (+4.84%)
Volume$146.98K
Capitalization961.08M
Stifel Financial
Price$128.87
Change+$4.59 (+3.69%)
Volume$1.05M
Capitalization13.1B
OPY vs SF Comparison Chart in %
OPY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
OPY vs. SF commentary
Feb 05, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is OPY is a Buy and SF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 05, 2026
Stock price -- (OPY: $90.78 vs. SF: $128.87)
Brand notoriety: OPY and SF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: OPY: 303% vs. SF: 129%
Market capitalization -- OPY: $961.08M vs. SF: $13.1B
OPY [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $961.08M. SF’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $13.1B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $10.54B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

OPY’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSF’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • OPY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, SF is a better buy in the long-term than OPY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

OPY’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • OPY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SF is a better buy in the short-term than OPY.

Price Growth

OPY (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а +20.75% price change this week, while SF (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was +2.08% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was -7.41%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -9.08%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.06%.

Reported Earning Dates

SF is expected to report earnings on Apr 29, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (-7.41% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SF($13.1B) has a higher market cap than OPY($961M). SF has higher P/E ratio than OPY: SF (21.95) vs OPY (6.96). OPY YTD gains are higher at: 25.578 vs. SF (2.915). OPY has less debt than SF: OPY (722M) vs SF (1.53B). SF has higher revenues than OPY: SF (5.27B) vs OPY (1.54B).
OPYSFOPY / SF
Capitalization961M13.1B7%
EBITDA248MN/A-
Gain YTD25.5782.915877%
P/E Ratio6.9621.9532%
Revenue1.54B5.27B29%
Total Cash28.8MN/A-
Total Debt722M1.53B47%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
OPY vs SF: Fundamental Ratings
OPY
SF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8468
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
25
Undervalued
82
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1525
SMR RATING
1..100
7212
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4254
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8529
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
6565

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

OPY's Valuation (25) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SF (82). This means that OPY’s stock grew somewhat faster than SF’s over the last 12 months.

OPY's Profit vs Risk Rating (15) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as SF (25). This means that OPY’s stock grew similarly to SF’s over the last 12 months.

SF's SMR Rating (12) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for OPY (72). This means that SF’s stock grew somewhat faster than OPY’s over the last 12 months.

OPY's Price Growth Rating (42) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as SF (54). This means that OPY’s stock grew similarly to SF’s over the last 12 months.

SF's P/E Growth Rating (29) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for OPY (85). This means that SF’s stock grew somewhat faster than OPY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
OPYSF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
41%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
60%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
61%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
OPY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LSHCX24.040.63
+2.69%
Kinetics Spin-Off and Corp Rest Adv C
FRRSX14.740.20
+1.38%
Franklin Real Estate Securities C
PEIJX43.270.46
+1.07%
Principal Equity Income J
LGASX68.730.66
+0.97%
ClearBridge Small Cap FI
NQQQX44.86-0.80
-1.75%
Shelton Nasdaq-100 Index Institutional

OPY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, OPY has been closely correlated with PIPR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if OPY jumps, then PIPR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OPY
1D Price
Change %
OPY100%
+4.84%
PIPR - OPY
67%
Closely correlated
+2.74%
SF - OPY
65%
Loosely correlated
+3.69%
MS - OPY
65%
Loosely correlated
-1.55%
MC - OPY
65%
Loosely correlated
+2.18%
JEF - OPY
64%
Loosely correlated
-2.48%
More

SF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SF has been closely correlated with RJF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SF jumps, then RJF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SF
1D Price
Change %
SF100%
+3.69%
RJF - SF
87%
Closely correlated
+2.22%
EVR - SF
84%
Closely correlated
+5.20%
MS - SF
84%
Closely correlated
-1.55%
GS - SF
82%
Closely correlated
-2.74%
PIPR - SF
82%
Closely correlated
+2.74%
More