OPOF
Price
$37.98
Change
+$0.04 (+0.11%)
Updated
Apr 17 closing price
Capitalization
89.71M
SFBC
Price
$49.94
Change
+$0.46 (+0.93%)
Updated
Apr 17 closing price
Capitalization
104.11M
Ad is loading...

OPOF vs SFBC

Header iconOPOF vs SFBC Comparison
Open Charts OPOF vs SFBCBanner chart's image
Old Point Financial
Price$37.98
Change+$0.04 (+0.11%)
Volume$17.43K
Capitalization89.71M
Sound Financial Ban
Price$49.94
Change+$0.46 (+0.93%)
Volume$3.42K
Capitalization104.11M
OPOF vs SFBC Comparison Chart
Loading...
OPOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
OPOF vs. SFBC commentary
Apr 20, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is OPOF is a Hold and SFBC is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 20, 2025
Stock price -- (OPOF: $37.98 vs. SFBC: $49.94)
Brand notoriety: OPOF and SFBC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: OPOF: 80% vs. SFBC: 165%
Market capitalization -- OPOF: $89.71M vs. SFBC: $104.11M
OPOF [@Regional Banks] is valued at $89.71M. SFBC’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $104.11M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.96B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

OPOF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSFBC’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • OPOF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SFBC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, OPOF is a better buy in the long-term than SFBC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

OPOF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • OPOF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

OPOF (@Regional Banks) experienced а +2.95% price change this week, while SFBC (@Regional Banks) price change was -0.77% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +3.11%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.66%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.78%.

Reported Earning Dates

OPOF is expected to report earnings on Jan 30, 2025.

SFBC is expected to report earnings on Jan 27, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+3.11% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SFBC($104M) has a higher market cap than OPOF($89.7M). SFBC has higher P/E ratio than OPOF: SFBC (14.23) vs OPOF (11.56). OPOF YTD gains are higher at: 46.412 vs. SFBC (-4.794). SFBC has less debt than OPOF: SFBC (56.5M) vs OPOF (99.1M). OPOF has higher revenues than SFBC: OPOF (60.9M) vs SFBC (38.9M).
OPOFSFBCOPOF / SFBC
Capitalization89.7M104M86%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD46.412-4.794-968%
P/E Ratio11.5614.2381%
Revenue60.9M38.9M157%
Total Cash14.5MN/A-
Total Debt99.1M56.5M175%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
OPOF vs SFBC: Fundamental Ratings
OPOF
SFBC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
98
Overvalued
82
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
148
SMR RATING
1..100
5166
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3553
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
67
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SFBC's Valuation (82) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as OPOF (98). This means that SFBC’s stock grew similarly to OPOF’s over the last 12 months.

SFBC's Profit vs Risk Rating (8) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as OPOF (14). This means that SFBC’s stock grew similarly to OPOF’s over the last 12 months.

OPOF's SMR Rating (51) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as SFBC (66). This means that OPOF’s stock grew similarly to SFBC’s over the last 12 months.

OPOF's Price Growth Rating (35) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as SFBC (53). This means that OPOF’s stock grew similarly to SFBC’s over the last 12 months.

OPOF's P/E Growth Rating (6) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as SFBC (7). This means that OPOF’s stock grew similarly to SFBC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
OPOF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
56%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
45%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
72%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
73%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
55%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
44%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
74%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
OPOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME26.780.53
+2.02%
GameStop Corp
AAPL196.982.71
+1.39%
Apple
BTC.X85063.414000612.609400
+0.73%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
SPY525.66N/A
N/A
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF
TSLA241.37-0.18
-0.07%
Tesla

OPOF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, OPOF has been loosely correlated with FISI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if OPOF jumps, then FISI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OPOF
1D Price
Change %
OPOF100%
+0.11%
FISI - OPOF
34%
Loosely correlated
-0.49%
BMRC - OPOF
32%
Poorly correlated
-0.20%
OVLY - OPOF
30%
Poorly correlated
+3.79%
PCB - OPOF
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EBMT - OPOF
29%
Poorly correlated
+2.13%
More

SFBC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SFBC and PBHC have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SFBC and PBHC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SFBC
1D Price
Change %
SFBC100%
+0.93%
PBHC - SFBC
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HBCP - SFBC
24%
Poorly correlated
+1.00%
AX - SFBC
24%
Poorly correlated
+1.95%
FCCO - SFBC
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
OPOF - SFBC
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.11%
More