OPEN
Price
$3.17
Change
+$0.13 (+4.28%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
2.33B
81 days until earnings call
ZDPY
Price
$0.51
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
6.16M
Interact to see
Advertisement

OPEN vs ZDPY

Header iconOPEN vs ZDPY Comparison
Open Charts OPEN vs ZDPYBanner chart's image
Opendoor Technologies
Price$3.17
Change+$0.13 (+4.28%)
Volume$419.37M
Capitalization2.33B
Zoned Properties
Price$0.51
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$1.6K
Capitalization6.16M
OPEN vs ZDPY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
OPEN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ZDPY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
OPEN vs. ZDPY commentary
Aug 17, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is OPEN is a Hold and ZDPY is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 17, 2025
Stock price -- (OPEN: $3.17 vs. ZDPY: $0.51)
Brand notoriety: OPEN and ZDPY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Development industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: OPEN: 219% vs. ZDPY: 46%
Market capitalization -- OPEN: $2.33B vs. ZDPY: $6.16M
OPEN [@Real Estate Development] is valued at $2.33B. ZDPY’s [@Real Estate Development] market capitalization is $6.16M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Development] industry ranges from $165.37B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Development] industry is $4.3B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

OPEN’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileZDPY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • OPEN’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • ZDPY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, ZDPY is a better buy in the long-term than OPEN.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

OPEN’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ZDPY’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • OPEN’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • ZDPY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, OPEN is a better buy in the short-term than ZDPY.

Price Growth

OPEN (@Real Estate Development) experienced а +62.56% price change this week, while ZDPY (@Real Estate Development) price change was +9.68% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Development industry was +3.18%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.54%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.52%.

Reported Earning Dates

OPEN is expected to report earnings on Nov 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Development (+3.18% weekly)

Activities range from the renovation and re-lease of existing buildings to the purchase of raw land and the sale of developed land or parcels to others. Demand for land development business is driven by GDP growth, employment rates, interest rates, and access to/cost of capital. For individual companies in this industry, proper cost estimation and successful bidding play critical roles in their profitability. Large companies could potentially have greater access to capital, while smaller companies can specialize in a specific geographic area or market niche. CBRE Group, VICI Properties Inc and Brookfield Property Partners L.P. are some of the large companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
OPEN($2.33B) has a higher market cap than ZDPY($6.17M). OPEN YTD gains are higher at: 98.125 vs. ZDPY (8.974). ZDPY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.71M vs. OPEN (-190M). OPEN has more cash in the bank: 559M vs. ZDPY (994K). ZDPY has less debt than OPEN: ZDPY (9.38M) vs OPEN (2.53B). OPEN has higher revenues than ZDPY: OPEN (5.13B) vs ZDPY (3.93M).
OPENZDPYOPEN / ZDPY
Capitalization2.33B6.17M37,843%
EBITDA-190M1.71M-11,092%
Gain YTD98.1258.9741,093%
P/E RatioN/A10.20-
Revenue5.13B3.93M130,374%
Total Cash559M994K56,237%
Total Debt2.53B9.38M26,933%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ZDPY: Fundamental Ratings
ZDPY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
71
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
93
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
60
SMR RATING
1..100
66
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
51
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
24
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
75

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
OPENZDPY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
62%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
65%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 28 days ago
70%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 20 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
87%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
OPEN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ZDPY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TEUIX26.750.05
+0.19%
T. Rowe Price European Stock I
GQGIX17.250.03
+0.17%
GQG Partners Emerging Markets EquityInst
RMOYX26.10-0.04
-0.15%
Victory RS Mid Cap Growth Y
AUUAX24.53-0.10
-0.41%
AB Select US Equity A
FDMLX11.48-0.08
-0.69%
Fidelity Series Intrinsic Opps

OPEN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, OPEN has been loosely correlated with OPAD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if OPEN jumps, then OPAD could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OPEN
1D Price
Change %
OPEN100%
+4.28%
OPAD - OPEN
53%
Loosely correlated
-5.30%
COMP - OPEN
35%
Loosely correlated
+0.23%
REAX - OPEN
29%
Poorly correlated
+0.45%
AIRE - OPEN
29%
Poorly correlated
+4.25%
RMAX - OPEN
29%
Poorly correlated
+1.37%
More

ZDPY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ZDPY and OPEN have been poorly correlated (+10% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ZDPY and OPEN's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ZDPY
1D Price
Change %
ZDPY100%
+0.02%
OPEN - ZDPY
10%
Poorly correlated
+4.28%
VONOY - ZDPY
10%
Poorly correlated
-0.60%
BRST - ZDPY
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
UK - ZDPY
0%
Poorly correlated
-1.00%
WRFRF - ZDPY
-2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More