OOBHF
Price
$4.10
Change
+$1.35 (+49.09%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
568.87M
TNLIY
Price
$6.81
Change
-$1.74 (-20.35%)
Updated
May 22 closing price
Capitalization
1.43B
Interact to see
Advertisement

OOBHF vs TNLIY

Header iconOOBHF vs TNLIY Comparison
Open Charts OOBHF vs TNLIYBanner chart's image
On the Beach Group
Price$4.10
Change+$1.35 (+49.09%)
Volume$15K
Capitalization568.87M
Trainline
Price$6.81
Change-$1.74 (-20.35%)
Volume$200
Capitalization1.43B
OOBHF vs TNLIY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
OOBHF vs. TNLIY commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is OOBHF is a Hold and TNLIY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (OOBHF: $4.10 vs. TNLIY: $6.81)
Brand notoriety: OOBHF and TNLIY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Consumer Sundries industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: OOBHF: 104% vs. TNLIY: 100%
Market capitalization -- OOBHF: $568.87M vs. TNLIY: $1.43B
OOBHF [@Consumer Sundries] is valued at $568.87M. TNLIY’s [@Consumer Sundries] market capitalization is $1.43B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Consumer Sundries] industry ranges from $178.44B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Consumer Sundries] industry is $18.39B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

OOBHF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTNLIY’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • OOBHF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • TNLIY’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, OOBHF is a better buy in the long-term than TNLIY.

Price Growth

OOBHF (@Consumer Sundries) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while TNLIY (@Consumer Sundries) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Consumer Sundries industry was +7.07%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +13.17%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.71%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Consumer Sundries (+7.07% weekly)

Consumer sundries companies make products that usually do not have another classification, such as lawn and garden products, pest-control products, pet food and pet products like leashes, collars, and harnesses. Central Garden & Pet Company and Dogness (International) Corporation are examples of companies operating in this industry.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TNLIY($1.43B) has a higher market cap than OOBHF($569M). OOBHF has higher P/E ratio than TNLIY: OOBHF (25.63) vs TNLIY (19.91). OOBHF YTD gains are higher at: 70.822 vs. TNLIY (-20.351).
OOBHFTNLIYOOBHF / TNLIY
Capitalization569M1.43B40%
EBITDA45.7MN/A-
Gain YTD70.822-20.351-348%
P/E Ratio25.6319.91129%
Revenue132MN/A-
Total Cash10.5MN/A-
Total Debt42MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
OOBHF: Fundamental Ratings
OOBHF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
49
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
54
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
98
SMR RATING
1..100
73
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
37
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
11
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
OOBHFTNLIY
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
14%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
12%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
16%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
11%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JSCZX17.290.21
+1.23%
JPMorgan US Small Company R2
JGRJX40.890.39
+0.96%
JPMorgan Growth Advantage R2
SOIAX8.250.07
+0.86%
Spirit of America Real Estate Inc&Gr Ins
TLVIX32.290.19
+0.59%
Thrivent Large Cap Value S
USBOX24.160.08
+0.33%
Pear Tree Quality Ordinary

OOBHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that OOBHF and TUIFF have been poorly correlated (+14% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that OOBHF and TUIFF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OOBHF
1D Price
Change %
OOBHF100%
N/A
TUIFF - OOBHF
14%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ABNB - OOBHF
11%
Poorly correlated
+0.38%
WEBJF - OOBHF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LSMNF - OOBHF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WOSSF - OOBHF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

TNLIY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that TNLIY and TUIFF have been poorly correlated (+2% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TNLIY and TUIFF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TNLIY
1D Price
Change %
TNLIY100%
N/A
TUIFF - TNLIY
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WEBJF - TNLIY
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LSMNF - TNLIY
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WOSSF - TNLIY
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
OOBHF - TNLIY
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More