ONVVF
Price
$0.16
Change
+$0.02 (+14.29%)
Updated
Nov 22 closing price
QLYS
Price
$140.73
Change
-$1.87 (-1.31%)
Updated
Dec 20 closing price
45 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

ONVVF vs QLYS

Header iconONVVF vs QLYS Comparison
Open Charts ONVVF vs QLYSBanner chart's image
Oneview Healthcare
Price$0.16
Change+$0.02 (+14.29%)
Volume$561
CapitalizationN/A
Qualys
Price$140.73
Change-$1.87 (-1.31%)
Volume$1.17M
CapitalizationN/A
ONVVF vs QLYS Comparison Chart
Loading...
QLYS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ONVVF vs. QLYS commentary
Dec 23, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ONVVF is a Hold and QLYS is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 23, 2024
Stock price -- (ONVVF: $0.16 vs. QLYS: $140.73)
Brand notoriety: ONVVF and QLYS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ONVVF: 6% vs. QLYS: 246%
Market capitalization -- ONVVF: $80.17M vs. QLYS: $6.17B
ONVVF [@Packaged Software] is valued at $80.17M. QLYS’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $6.17B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $3.15T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $11.71B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ONVVF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileQLYS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • ONVVF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • QLYS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, QLYS is a better buy in the long-term than ONVVF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

QLYS’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • QLYS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

ONVVF (@Packaged Software) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while QLYS (@Packaged Software) price change was -4.62% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +4.24%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +10.60%, and the average quarterly price growth was +21.20%.

Reported Earning Dates

QLYS is expected to report earnings on Feb 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (+4.24% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
QLYS($6.17B) has a higher market cap than ONVVF($80.2M). ONVVF YTD gains are higher at: 6.667 vs. QLYS (-28.301). QLYS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 190M vs. ONVVF (-8.05M). QLYS has more cash in the bank: 426M vs. ONVVF (15.2M). ONVVF has less debt than QLYS: ONVVF (1.21M) vs QLYS (28.7M). QLYS has higher revenues than ONVVF: QLYS (554M) vs ONVVF (10.2M).
ONVVFQLYSONVVF / QLYS
Capitalization80.2M6.17B1%
EBITDA-8.05M190M-4%
Gain YTD6.667-28.301-24%
P/E RatioN/A41.51-
Revenue10.2M554M2%
Total Cash15.2M426M4%
Total Debt1.21M28.7M4%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
QLYS: Fundamental Ratings
QLYS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
57
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
75
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
48
SMR RATING
1..100
21
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
57
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
85
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
QLYS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 19 days ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
69%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
QLYS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME29.820.82
+2.83%
GameStop Corp
AAPL254.494.70
+1.88%
Apple
SPY591.157.02
+1.20%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
BTC.X95104.940000-2119.789000
-2.18%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA421.06-15.11
-3.46%
Tesla

ONVVF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ONVVF has been loosely correlated with CDXFF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ONVVF jumps, then CDXFF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ONVVF
1D Price
Change %
ONVVF100%
N/A
CDXFF - ONVVF
38%
Loosely correlated
N/A
QLYS - ONVVF
34%
Loosely correlated
-1.31%
DOCU - ONVVF
25%
Poorly correlated
+0.28%
VQSSF - ONVVF
24%
Poorly correlated
+25.00%
XTKG - ONVVF
21%
Poorly correlated
-10.82%
More

QLYS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QLYS has been loosely correlated with TENB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if QLYS jumps, then TENB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To QLYS
1D Price
Change %
QLYS100%
-1.31%
TENB - QLYS
55%
Loosely correlated
+0.27%
DJCO - QLYS
51%
Loosely correlated
-0.14%
FOXO - QLYS
50%
Loosely correlated
-4.42%
RPD - QLYS
47%
Loosely correlated
-2.21%
SPSC - QLYS
46%
Loosely correlated
-1.04%
More