ONVC
Price
$1.90
Change
-$0.05 (-2.56%)
Updated
Aug 7 closing price
Capitalization
14.43M
TRZBF
Price
$1.73
Change
-$0.28 (-13.93%)
Updated
Aug 1 closing price
Capitalization
74.8M
Interact to see
Advertisement

ONVC vs TRZBF

Header iconONVC vs TRZBF Comparison
Open Charts ONVC vs TRZBFBanner chart's image
Online Vacation Center Holdings
Price$1.90
Change-$0.05 (-2.56%)
Volume$500
Capitalization14.43M
Transat A.T
Price$1.73
Change-$0.28 (-13.93%)
Volume$121
Capitalization74.8M
ONVC vs TRZBF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
ONVC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TRZBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ONVC vs. TRZBF commentary
Aug 11, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ONVC is a StrongBuy and TRZBF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 11, 2025
Stock price -- (ONVC: $1.90 vs. TRZBF: $1.73)
Brand notoriety: ONVC and TRZBF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Consumer Sundries industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ONVC: 55% vs. TRZBF: 18%
Market capitalization -- ONVC: $14.43M vs. TRZBF: $74.8M
ONVC [@Consumer Sundries] is valued at $14.43M. TRZBF’s [@Consumer Sundries] market capitalization is $74.8M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Consumer Sundries] industry ranges from $175.2B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Consumer Sundries] industry is $16.87B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ONVC’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileTRZBF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • ONVC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • TRZBF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, ONVC is a better buy in the long-term than TRZBF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ONVC’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TRZBF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ONVC’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • TRZBF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ONVC is a better buy in the short-term than TRZBF.

Price Growth

ONVC (@Consumer Sundries) experienced а -2.56% price change this week, while TRZBF (@Consumer Sundries) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Consumer Sundries industry was +1.18%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.51%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.13%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Consumer Sundries (+1.18% weekly)

Consumer sundries companies make products that usually do not have another classification, such as lawn and garden products, pest-control products, pet food and pet products like leashes, collars, and harnesses. Central Garden & Pet Company and Dogness (International) Corporation are examples of companies operating in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRZBF($74.8M) has a higher market cap than ONVC($14.4M). TRZBF YTD gains are higher at: 39.516 vs. ONVC (16.923).
ONVCTRZBFONVC / TRZBF
Capitalization14.4M74.8M19%
EBITDAN/A251M-
Gain YTD16.92339.51643%
P/E Ratio15.70N/A-
RevenueN/A3.39B-
Total CashN/A533M-
Total DebtN/A2.08B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ONVC vs TRZBF: Fundamental Ratings
ONVC
TRZBF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
79
Overvalued
91
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
24100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4742
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
251
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
3042

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ONVC's Valuation (79) in the null industry is in the same range as TRZBF (91). This means that ONVC’s stock grew similarly to TRZBF’s over the last 12 months.

ONVC's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as TRZBF (100). This means that ONVC’s stock grew similarly to TRZBF’s over the last 12 months.

ONVC's SMR Rating (24) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for TRZBF (100). This means that ONVC’s stock grew significantly faster than TRZBF’s over the last 12 months.

TRZBF's Price Growth Rating (42) in the null industry is in the same range as ONVC (47). This means that TRZBF’s stock grew similarly to ONVC’s over the last 12 months.

TRZBF's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the null industry is in the same range as ONVC (25). This means that TRZBF’s stock grew similarly to ONVC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ONVCTRZBF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
52%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
51%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
69%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
66%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
49%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
51%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
46%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
61%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ONVC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TRZBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
WCFB8.40N/A
N/A
WCF Bancorp, Inc.
MCRAB49.00N/A
N/A
McRae Industries, Inc.
TMICF58.29N/A
N/A
Trend Micro Inc.
FXCXD1.80N/A
N/A
FIH Mobile Ltd
TKOMF40.21-3.21
-7.39%
Tokio Marine Holdings, Inc.

ONVC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ONVC and MNLXF have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ONVC and MNLXF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ONVC
1D Price
Change %
ONVC100%
N/A
MNLXF - ONVC
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ISPO - ONVC
1%
Poorly correlated
-1.62%
NTRP - ONVC
1%
Poorly correlated
+0.25%
TRZBF - ONVC
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WEBJF - ONVC
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

TRZBF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that TRZBF and SCI have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TRZBF and SCI's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TRZBF
1D Price
Change %
TRZBF100%
N/A
SCI - TRZBF
22%
Poorly correlated
+1.44%
WOSSF - TRZBF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TUIFF - TRZBF
16%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WEBJF - TRZBF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ABNB - TRZBF
6%
Poorly correlated
+0.82%
More