ONEXF
Price
$88.14
Change
-$0.03 (-0.03%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
6.08B
41 days until earnings call
SAR
Price
$24.38
Change
+$0.06 (+0.25%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
388.91M
11 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

ONEXF vs SAR

Header iconONEXF vs SAR Comparison
Open Charts ONEXF vs SARBanner chart's image
Onex
Price$88.14
Change-$0.03 (-0.03%)
Volume$4.49K
Capitalization6.08B
SARATOGA INVESTMENT
Price$24.38
Change+$0.06 (+0.25%)
Volume$87.24K
Capitalization388.91M
ONEXF vs SAR Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
ONEXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SAR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ONEXF vs. SAR commentary
Sep 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ONEXF is a Hold and SAR is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 28, 2025
Stock price -- (ONEXF: $88.14 vs. SAR: $24.38)
Brand notoriety: ONEXF and SAR are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ONEXF: 80% vs. SAR: 76%
Market capitalization -- ONEXF: $6.08B vs. SAR: $388.91M
ONEXF [@Investment Managers] is valued at $6.08B. SAR’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $388.91M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $179.08B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $7.43B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ONEXF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSAR’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • ONEXF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SAR’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, ONEXF is a better buy in the long-term than SAR.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ONEXF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SAR’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ONEXF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • SAR’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SAR is a better buy in the short-term than ONEXF.

Price Growth

ONEXF (@Investment Managers) experienced а -1.35% price change this week, while SAR (@Investment Managers) price change was -1.89% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -1.95%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.07%, and the average quarterly price growth was +39.07%.

Reported Earning Dates

ONEXF is expected to report earnings on Nov 07, 2025.

SAR is expected to report earnings on Oct 08, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-1.95% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ONEXF($6.08B) has a higher market cap than SAR($389M). ONEXF has higher P/E ratio than SAR: ONEXF (12.02) vs SAR (9.95). ONEXF (12.080) and SAR (11.705) have similar YTD gains . SAR has less debt than ONEXF: SAR (781M) vs ONEXF (4.75B).
ONEXFSARONEXF / SAR
Capitalization6.08B389M1,563%
EBITDA539MN/A-
Gain YTD12.08011.705103%
P/E Ratio12.029.95121%
Revenue841MN/A-
Total Cash636MN/A-
Total Debt4.75B781M609%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ONEXF vs SAR: Fundamental Ratings
ONEXF
SAR
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
598
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
32
Undervalued
4
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4112
SMR RATING
1..100
8248
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4555
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1193
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a24

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SAR's Valuation (4) in the null industry is in the same range as ONEXF (32). This means that SAR’s stock grew similarly to ONEXF’s over the last 12 months.

SAR's Profit vs Risk Rating (12) in the null industry is in the same range as ONEXF (41). This means that SAR’s stock grew similarly to ONEXF’s over the last 12 months.

SAR's SMR Rating (48) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ONEXF (82). This means that SAR’s stock grew somewhat faster than ONEXF’s over the last 12 months.

ONEXF's Price Growth Rating (45) in the null industry is in the same range as SAR (55). This means that ONEXF’s stock grew similarly to SAR’s over the last 12 months.

ONEXF's P/E Growth Rating (11) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for SAR (93). This means that ONEXF’s stock grew significantly faster than SAR’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ONEXFSAR
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
46%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
38%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
39%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
36%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
39%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
51%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
38%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
42%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ONEXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SAR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SOME57.640.03
+0.05%
Somerset Trust Holding Co.
CBAUF107.40N/A
N/A
Commonwealth Bank of Australia
MNHFF72.00N/A
N/A
Mayr-Melnhof Karton AG
MOAEY0.31N/A
N/A
Mongolia Energy Corp., Ltd.
WRFRF2.82-0.06
-2.09%
Wharf Real Estate Investment Co Ltd.

ONEXF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ONEXF and AIMFF have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ONEXF and AIMFF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ONEXF
1D Price
Change %
ONEXF100%
-0.03%
AIMFF - ONEXF
28%
Poorly correlated
-0.09%
SAR - ONEXF
26%
Poorly correlated
+0.25%
SII - ONEXF
23%
Poorly correlated
+4.50%
TGOPY - ONEXF
21%
Poorly correlated
+2.54%
TROW - ONEXF
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.25%
More

SAR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SAR has been loosely correlated with NMFC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SAR jumps, then NMFC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SAR
1D Price
Change %
SAR100%
+0.25%
NMFC - SAR
59%
Loosely correlated
-0.72%
GLAD - SAR
58%
Loosely correlated
-1.16%
MAIN - SAR
58%
Loosely correlated
+0.05%
NCDL - SAR
56%
Loosely correlated
-0.21%
BXSL - SAR
55%
Loosely correlated
-1.17%
More