ONEW
Price
$15.70
Change
+$0.47 (+3.09%)
Updated
Oct 15, 11:14 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
249.32M
28 days until earnings call
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
RUSHA
Price
$52.21
Change
+$0.24 (+0.46%)
Updated
Oct 15, 11:11 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
4.13B
13 days until earnings call
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

ONEW vs RUSHA

Header iconONEW vs RUSHA Comparison
Open Charts ONEW vs RUSHABanner chart's image
OneWater Marine
Price$15.70
Change+$0.47 (+3.09%)
Volume$100
Capitalization249.32M
Rush Enterprises
Price$52.21
Change+$0.24 (+0.46%)
Volume$100
Capitalization4.13B
ONEW vs RUSHA Comparison Chart in %
ONEW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RUSHA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ONEW vs. RUSHA commentary
Oct 17, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ONEW is a Hold and RUSHA is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 17, 2025
Stock price -- (ONEW: $15.23 vs. RUSHA: $51.97)
Brand notoriety: ONEW and RUSHA are both not notable
ONEW represents the Specialty Stores, while RUSHA is part of the Automotive Aftermarket industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ONEW: 85% vs. RUSHA: 111%
Market capitalization -- ONEW: $249.32M vs. RUSHA: $4.13B
ONEW [@Specialty Stores] is valued at $249.32M. RUSHA’s [@Automotive Aftermarket] market capitalization is $4.13B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Specialty Stores] industry ranges from $49.11B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Automotive Aftermarket] industry ranges from $47.76B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Specialty Stores] industry is $4.08B. The average market capitalization across the [@Automotive Aftermarket] industry is $3.82B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ONEW’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileRUSHA’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • ONEW’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • RUSHA’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, RUSHA is a better buy in the long-term than ONEW.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ONEW’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RUSHA’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ONEW’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • RUSHA’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, RUSHA is a better buy in the short-term than ONEW.

Price Growth

ONEW (@Specialty Stores) experienced а +1.20% price change this week, while RUSHA (@Automotive Aftermarket) price change was +4.61% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Stores industry was -3.15%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.01%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.79%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Automotive Aftermarket industry was -0.59%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -7.83%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.34%.

Reported Earning Dates

ONEW is expected to report earnings on Nov 13, 2025.

RUSHA is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Specialty Stores (-3.15% weekly)

The specialty stores sector includes companies dedicated to the sale of retail products focused on a single product category, such as clothing, carpet, books, or office supplies. A specialty store could face intense competition from big-box departmental chains, and therefore offering an adequate collection of the product type it specializes in is key in maintaining/growing its market.

@Automotive Aftermarket (-0.59% weekly)

The Automotive Aftermarket consists of the manufacturing, remanufacturing, distribution, retailing, and installation of vehicle parts and accessories, after the sale of the automobile by the original equipment manufacturer (OEM) to the consumer. The aftermarket parts many not be manufactured by the OEM. According to a Technavio study, the US automotive parts aftermarket size is estimated to grow by USD 24.33 billion during 2018-2022 (CAGR 3%). Like many other industries, the automotive aftermarket is also being intensely penetrated by the digital boom. The online auto parts sales market is predicted to exceed $13B by 2020 (according to a study by Mirakl).

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RUSHA($4.13B) has a higher market cap than ONEW($249M). RUSHA YTD gains are higher at: -4.165 vs. ONEW (-12.371). RUSHA has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 682M vs. ONEW (73.6M). RUSHA has more cash in the bank: 211M vs. ONEW (70.1M). ONEW has less debt than RUSHA: ONEW (990M) vs RUSHA (1.75B). RUSHA has higher revenues than ONEW: RUSHA (7.69B) vs ONEW (1.79B).
ONEWRUSHAONEW / RUSHA
Capitalization249M4.13B6%
EBITDA73.6M682M11%
Gain YTD-12.371-4.165297%
P/E RatioN/A14.81-
Revenue1.79B7.69B23%
Total Cash70.1M211M33%
Total Debt990M1.75B56%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
RUSHA: Fundamental Ratings
RUSHA
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
53
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
35
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
23
SMR RATING
1..100
57
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
75
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
42
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
85

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ONEWRUSHA
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
53%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
60%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
44%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ONEW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RUSHA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DVZRX72.981.24
+1.73%
Macquarie Small Cap Value R6
RREYX30.230.25
+0.83%
Russell Inv Global Real Estate Secs Y
CDDRX37.05N/A
N/A
Columbia Dividend Income Inst2
MXMVX13.87N/A
N/A
Empower Mid Cap Value Inv
RYOIX75.79N/A
N/A
Rydex Biotechnology Inv

ONEW and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ONEW has been loosely correlated with HZO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ONEW jumps, then HZO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ONEW
1D Price
Change %
ONEW100%
+3.75%
HZO - ONEW
63%
Loosely correlated
+7.87%
AN - ONEW
55%
Loosely correlated
+2.38%
RUSHA - ONEW
54%
Loosely correlated
+2.22%
ABG - ONEW
54%
Loosely correlated
+2.87%
ASO - ONEW
53%
Loosely correlated
+2.67%
More

RUSHA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RUSHA has been closely correlated with RUSHB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RUSHA jumps, then RUSHB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RUSHA
1D Price
Change %
RUSHA100%
+2.22%
RUSHB - RUSHA
86%
Closely correlated
+1.94%
AN - RUSHA
67%
Closely correlated
+2.38%
ABG - RUSHA
66%
Loosely correlated
+2.87%
GPI - RUSHA
65%
Loosely correlated
+3.79%
LAD - RUSHA
64%
Loosely correlated
+3.00%
More