ONEW
Price
$15.22
Change
-$0.51 (-3.24%)
Updated
Aug 8 closing price
Capitalization
249.16M
94 days until earnings call
RUSHA
Price
$55.16
Change
-$0.04 (-0.07%)
Updated
Aug 8 closing price
Capitalization
4.29B
78 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

ONEW vs RUSHA

Header iconONEW vs RUSHA Comparison
Open Charts ONEW vs RUSHABanner chart's image
OneWater Marine
Price$15.22
Change-$0.51 (-3.24%)
Volume$87.17K
Capitalization249.16M
Rush Enterprises
Price$55.16
Change-$0.04 (-0.07%)
Volume$224.27K
Capitalization4.29B
ONEW vs RUSHA Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
ONEW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RUSHA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ONEW vs. RUSHA commentary
Aug 11, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ONEW is a Buy and RUSHA is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 11, 2025
Stock price -- (ONEW: $15.22 vs. RUSHA: $55.16)
Brand notoriety: ONEW and RUSHA are both not notable
ONEW represents the Specialty Stores, while RUSHA is part of the Automotive Aftermarket industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ONEW: 61% vs. RUSHA: 51%
Market capitalization -- ONEW: $249.16M vs. RUSHA: $4.29B
ONEW [@Specialty Stores] is valued at $249.16M. RUSHA’s [@Automotive Aftermarket] market capitalization is $4.29B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Specialty Stores] industry ranges from $48.32B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Automotive Aftermarket] industry ranges from $47.99B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Specialty Stores] industry is $3.92B. The average market capitalization across the [@Automotive Aftermarket] industry is $3.92B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ONEW’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileRUSHA’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • ONEW’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • RUSHA’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, RUSHA is a better buy in the long-term than ONEW.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ONEW’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RUSHA’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ONEW’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • RUSHA’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, RUSHA is a better buy in the short-term than ONEW.

Price Growth

ONEW (@Specialty Stores) experienced а -3.37% price change this week, while RUSHA (@Automotive Aftermarket) price change was +3.01% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Stores industry was +0.64%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.61%, and the average quarterly price growth was -2.38%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Automotive Aftermarket industry was +1.14%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -6.47%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.93%.

Reported Earning Dates

ONEW is expected to report earnings on Nov 13, 2025.

RUSHA is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Specialty Stores (+0.64% weekly)

The specialty stores sector includes companies dedicated to the sale of retail products focused on a single product category, such as clothing, carpet, books, or office supplies. A specialty store could face intense competition from big-box departmental chains, and therefore offering an adequate collection of the product type it specializes in is key in maintaining/growing its market.

@Automotive Aftermarket (+1.14% weekly)

The Automotive Aftermarket consists of the manufacturing, remanufacturing, distribution, retailing, and installation of vehicle parts and accessories, after the sale of the automobile by the original equipment manufacturer (OEM) to the consumer. The aftermarket parts many not be manufactured by the OEM. According to a Technavio study, the US automotive parts aftermarket size is estimated to grow by USD 24.33 billion during 2018-2022 (CAGR 3%). Like many other industries, the automotive aftermarket is also being intensely penetrated by the digital boom. The online auto parts sales market is predicted to exceed $13B by 2020 (according to a study by Mirakl).

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RUSHA($4.29B) has a higher market cap than ONEW($249M). RUSHA YTD gains are higher at: 1.365 vs. ONEW (-12.428). RUSHA has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 691M vs. ONEW (73.6M). RUSHA has more cash in the bank: 229M vs. ONEW (70.1M). ONEW has less debt than RUSHA: ONEW (990M) vs RUSHA (1.73B). RUSHA has higher revenues than ONEW: RUSHA (7.78B) vs ONEW (1.79B).
ONEWRUSHAONEW / RUSHA
Capitalization249M4.29B6%
EBITDA73.6M691M11%
Gain YTD-12.4281.365-910%
P/E RatioN/A15.72-
Revenue1.79B7.78B23%
Total Cash70.1M229M31%
Total Debt990M1.73B57%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
RUSHA: Fundamental Ratings
RUSHA
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
36
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
16
SMR RATING
1..100
57
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
51
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
34
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
15

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ONEWRUSHA
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
57%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
66%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
77%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
72%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 18 days ago
72%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
60%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
86%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
74%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ONEW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RUSHA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ALGGY6.60N/A
N/A
Alliance Global Group, Inc.
BCSO59.34N/A
N/A
Bancorp Southern Indiana
HEINY39.86-0.13
-0.34%
Heineken N.V.
JDSPY1.14-0.03
-2.56%
JD Sports Fashion PLC
KPIFF0.04N/A
-8.66%
Edgewater Wireless Systems, Inc.

ONEW and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ONEW has been loosely correlated with HZO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ONEW jumps, then HZO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ONEW
1D Price
Change %
ONEW100%
-3.24%
HZO - ONEW
63%
Loosely correlated
-2.56%
ABG - ONEW
53%
Loosely correlated
-0.76%
RUSHA - ONEW
52%
Loosely correlated
-0.07%
ASO - ONEW
51%
Loosely correlated
-1.14%
AN - ONEW
51%
Loosely correlated
+0.92%
More

RUSHA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RUSHA has been closely correlated with RUSHB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RUSHA jumps, then RUSHB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RUSHA
1D Price
Change %
RUSHA100%
-0.07%
RUSHB - RUSHA
85%
Closely correlated
+1.43%
AN - RUSHA
71%
Closely correlated
+0.92%
ABG - RUSHA
67%
Closely correlated
-0.76%
GPI - RUSHA
67%
Closely correlated
+1.53%
PAG - RUSHA
66%
Loosely correlated
-0.15%
More