Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ONEO vs XMHQ
ONEO vs XMHQ Comparison
Open Charts ONEO vs XMHQ
Stt Strt® SPDR® Russell 1000 Momt FocETF
Price$128.10
Change-$1.14 (-0.88%)
Volume$1.67K
Net Assets27.2M
Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF
Price$106.69
Change+$0.27 (+0.25%)
Volume$730
Net Assets5.28B
ONEO vs XMHQ Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ONEO vs. XMHQ commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ONEO is a Hold and XMHQ is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
XMHQ has more net assets: 5.29B vs. ONEO (27.2M). ONEO has a higher annual dividend yield than XMHQ: ONEO (5.002) vs XMHQ (3.905). ONEO was incepted earlier than XMHQ: ONEO (10 years) vs XMHQ (19 years). ONEO (0.20) has a lower expense ratio than XMHQ (0.25). XMHQ has a higher turnover ONEO (42.00) vs ONEO (42.00).
| ONEO | XMHQ | ONEO / XMHQ | |
| Gain YTD | 5.002 | 3.905 | 128% |
| Net Assets | 27.2M | 5.29B | 1% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.20 | 0.25 | 80% |
| Turnover | 42.00 | 58.00 | 72% |
| Yield | 1.24 | 0.62 | 200% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 19 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| ONEO | XMHQ | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 74% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 86% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 88% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 84% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 82% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 75% | 14 days ago 85% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 6 days ago 80% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 86% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 82% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
ONEO and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ONEO has been loosely correlated with BLDR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ONEO jumps, then BLDR could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ONEO | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ONEO | 100% | N/A | ||
| BLDR - ONEO | 61% Loosely correlated | +4.67% | ||
| RS - ONEO | 60% Loosely correlated | +1.21% | ||
| LRCX - ONEO | 53% Loosely correlated | -3.12% | ||
| WSM - ONEO | 49% Loosely correlated | +0.93% | ||
| CTSH - ONEO | 48% Loosely correlated | -10.14% | ||
More | ||||
XMHQ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, XMHQ has been closely correlated with AIT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if XMHQ jumps, then AIT could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To XMHQ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| XMHQ | 100% | -0.56% | ||
| AIT - XMHQ | 80% Closely correlated | +1.19% | ||
| SEIC - XMHQ | 78% Closely correlated | -5.14% | ||
| GGG - XMHQ | 78% Closely correlated | +0.35% | ||
| VNT - XMHQ | 78% Closely correlated | +2.65% | ||
| DCI - XMHQ | 77% Closely correlated | +2.21% | ||
More | ||||