Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ONEO vs SCHM
ONEO vs SCHM Comparison
Open Charts ONEO vs SCHM
Stt Strt® SPDR® Russell 1000 Momt FocETF
Price$128.10
Change-$1.14 (-0.88%)
Volume$1.67K
Net Assets27.2M
Schwab US Mid-Cap ETF™
Price$31.75
Change-$0.18 (-0.56%)
Volume$924
Net Assets13.06B
ONEO vs SCHM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ONEO vs. SCHM commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ONEO is a Hold and SCHM is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCHM has more net assets: 13.1B vs. ONEO (27.2M). SCHM has a higher annual dividend yield than ONEO: SCHM (6.186) vs ONEO (5.002). ONEO was incepted earlier than SCHM: ONEO (10 years) vs SCHM (15 years). SCHM (0.04) has a lower expense ratio than ONEO (0.20). ONEO has a higher turnover SCHM (17.00) vs SCHM (17.00).
| ONEO | SCHM | ONEO / SCHM | |
| Gain YTD | 5.002 | 6.186 | 81% |
| Net Assets | 27.2M | 13.1B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.20 | 0.04 | 500% |
| Turnover | 42.00 | 17.00 | 247% |
| Yield | 1.24 | 1.39 | 89% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 15 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| ONEO | SCHM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 84% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 80% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 81% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 79% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 81% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 6 days ago 80% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 76% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
ONEO and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ONEO has been loosely correlated with BLDR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ONEO jumps, then BLDR could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ONEO | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ONEO | 100% | N/A | ||
| BLDR - ONEO | 61% Loosely correlated | +4.67% | ||
| RS - ONEO | 60% Loosely correlated | +1.21% | ||
| LRCX - ONEO | 53% Loosely correlated | -3.12% | ||
| WSM - ONEO | 49% Loosely correlated | +0.93% | ||
| CTSH - ONEO | 48% Loosely correlated | -10.14% | ||
More | ||||
SCHM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SCHM has been loosely correlated with STLD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SCHM jumps, then STLD could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SCHM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCHM | 100% | +0.16% | ||
| STLD - SCHM | 55% Loosely correlated | +3.43% | ||
| PTC - SCHM | 54% Loosely correlated | -4.89% | ||
| DKNG - SCHM | 52% Loosely correlated | -2.41% | ||
| NTAP - SCHM | 42% Loosely correlated | -2.02% | ||
| WDC - SCHM | 41% Loosely correlated | +7.40% | ||
More | ||||