ONDS vs UBLXF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ONDS is a StrongBuy and UBLXF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ONDS’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileUBLXF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- ONDS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- UBLXF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ONDS’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- ONDS’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
ONDS (@Telecommunications Equipment) experienced а +92.66% price change this week, while UBLXF (@Telecommunications Equipment) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Telecommunications Equipment industry was -3.49%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.11%, and the average quarterly price growth was +44.64%.
Reported Earning Dates
ONDS is expected to report earnings on Mar 10, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Telecommunications Equipment (-3.49% weekly)The Telecommunications Equipment industry produces voice and data communications equipment, which includes fiber optic delivery products, digital signal processors, high-speed voice, data and video delivery. Additionally, satellite systems, global positioning systems, wireless data systems, personal communications equipment, telephone handsets and payload equipment for satellites also fall into this category. Apple Inc., QUALCOMM Incorporated and Nokia are major global players in this segment.
| ONDS | UBLXF | ONDS / UBLXF | |
| Capitalization | 82M | 797M | 10% |
| EBITDA | -56.36M | 164M | -34% |
| Gain YTD | 9.150 | -34.601 | -26% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | 6.67 | - |
| Revenue | 11.2M | 624M | 2% |
| Total Cash | 21M | 138M | 15% |
| Total Debt | 33.4M | 95M | 35% |
ONDS | UBLXF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 26 | 25 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 71 Overvalued | 19 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 98 | 35 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 34 | 63 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
UBLXF's Valuation (19) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ONDS (71). This means that UBLXF’s stock grew somewhat faster than ONDS’s over the last 12 months.
UBLXF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as ONDS (100). This means that UBLXF’s stock grew similarly to ONDS’s over the last 12 months.
UBLXF's SMR Rating (35) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ONDS (98). This means that UBLXF’s stock grew somewhat faster than ONDS’s over the last 12 months.
ONDS's Price Growth Rating (34) in the null industry is in the same range as UBLXF (63). This means that ONDS’s stock grew similarly to UBLXF’s over the last 12 months.
ONDS's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as UBLXF (100). This means that ONDS’s stock grew similarly to UBLXF’s over the last 12 months.
| ONDS | |
|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 14 days ago 90% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% |
ONDS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that ONDS and KN have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ONDS and KN's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ONDS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ONDS | 100% | +0.60% | ||
| KN - ONDS | 25% Poorly correlated | -2.42% | ||
| DGII - ONDS | 24% Poorly correlated | -1.78% | ||
| BDC - ONDS | 24% Poorly correlated | -3.77% | ||
| FEIM - ONDS | 23% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| AKTS - ONDS | 23% Poorly correlated | -9.05% | ||
More | ||||
UBLXF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that UBLXF and PAOTF have been poorly correlated (+4% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that UBLXF and PAOTF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To UBLXF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| UBLXF | 100% | N/A | ||
| PAOTF - UBLXF | 4% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| QTRHF - UBLXF | 4% Poorly correlated | -0.69% | ||
| ONDS - UBLXF | 3% Poorly correlated | +0.60% | ||
| NOKBF - UBLXF | 2% Poorly correlated | -2.59% | ||
| OKIEY - UBLXF | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||